延性系数和调幅因子对等延性强度谱的影响分析

来庆辉1,胡进军1,樊圆2,谢礼立1

振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 131-135.

PDF(1571 KB)
PDF(1571 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 131-135.
论文

延性系数和调幅因子对等延性强度谱的影响分析

  • 来庆辉1,胡进军1,樊圆2,谢礼立1
作者信息 +

Analysis of the influence of ductility factor and amplitude modulation coefficient on the constant-ductility strength spectra

  • LAI Qinghui1,HU Jinjun1,FAN Yuan2,XIE Lili1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在目前结构抗震设计中,将调幅后的地震动记录作为地震动输入匹配规范谱的方法非常常见;为了分析延性系数和调幅因子对等延性强度谱的影响,通过计算单自由度体系动力时程弹塑性反应,分析了延性系数、调幅因子等因素对等延性屈服强度谱和等延性地震抗力谱的影响。经研究分析得出在不同延性系数、调幅因子条件下等延性屈服强度谱和等延性地震抗力谱的变化规律:当周期确定时,对地震动记录进行调幅时等延性地震抗力谱谱值变化趋势与调幅因子增减相同,而等延性屈服强度谱不变;延性系数逐渐增大时,等延性屈服强度谱和等延性地震抗力谱的谱值会逐渐减小。研究成果解释和阐明了延性系数和调幅因子对等延性强度谱的影响以及复杂的地震作用与结构动力特性之间的关系,可以为结构抗震研究和设计提供依据。

Abstract

Abstract:In current structural seismic design, it is very common to match amplitude-modulated ground motion records with the standard spectra.To analyze the influence of ductility coefficient and amplitude modulation factor on the constant-ductility strength spectra, in this paper, the influence of ductility factor and amplitude modulation factor on the constant-ductility yield strength spectra and constant-ductility seismic resistance spectra was analyzed by calculating the dynamic time-history inelastic response of a single-degree-of-freedom system.Through research and analysis, the change regulation of constant-ductility yield strength spectra and constant-ductility seismic resistance spectra under different ductility coefficient and amplitude modulation factor conditions was obtained.When the period was determined, the constant-ductility seismic resistance spectra value increased and decreased when the amplitude of ground motion was modulated, but the constant-ductility yield strength spectra did not change; When the ductility coefficient increased gradually, the constant-ductility yield strength spectra values and constant-ductility seismic resistance spectra values decreased gradually.The results explain and illustrate the influence of ductility coefficient and amplitude modulation factor on constant-ductility intensity spectra and the relationship between complex seismic action and structural dynamic characteristics, which provide a basis for seismic research and design of structures.

关键词

等延性强度谱 / 弹塑性反应 / 延性系数 / 调幅因子

Key words

constant-ductility strength spectra / elastic-plasticresponse / ductility factor / amplitude modulation coefficient

引用本文

导出引用
来庆辉1,胡进军1,樊圆2,谢礼立1. 延性系数和调幅因子对等延性强度谱的影响分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(8): 131-135
LAI Qinghui1,HU Jinjun1,FAN Yuan2,XIE Lili1. Analysis of the influence of ductility factor and amplitude modulation coefficient on the constant-ductility strength spectra[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(8): 131-135

参考文献

[1] Applied Technology Council. ATC-40-Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings[R]. Calif: Applied Technology Council, 1996. [2] CHOPRA A K. GOEL R K. Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems[R]. Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engrg Res Ctr, University of California, 1999. [3]薛尚铃, 余周, 徐革,等. 银川德丰大厦弹塑性动力时程分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2017(5):37-42. XUE Shangling, YU Zhou, XUGe, et al. Elastoplastic dynamic time history analysis of Yinchuan de Feng building[J]. Building Structure, 2017(5):37-42. [4]何海健, 徐孟豪, 苏亮,等. 结构弹塑性时程分析中输入地震动的选取数量研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2018(2):150-156. HE Haijian, XU Menghao, SU Liang, et al. Study on the number of input ground motion in elastoplastic time history analysis of structures[J]. Earthquake engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018(2):150-156. [5]Newmark N.M. and Hall. W.J. Seismic Design Criteria and Nuclear Reactor Facilities. Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standard, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1973:209-236. [6] Nassar A.A. and Krawinkler H.. Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems. Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1991:12-45. [7] 易伟建, 张海燕. 弹塑性反应谱的比较及其应用[J]. 湖南大学学报, 2005, 32(2): 42-45. YI Weijian, ZHANG Haiyan. Comparison and application of elastoplastic response spectra[J]. Journal of Hunan University, 2005, 32(2): 42-45. [8] 翟长海, 谢礼立, 张茂花. 恢复力模型对等延性地震抗力谱的影响分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2006, 38(8): 1228-1230. ZHAI Changhai, XIE Lili, ZHANG Maohua. Analysis of influence of restoring force model on equivalent ductility seismic resistance spectrum[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006, 38(8): 1228-1230. [9] 翟长海, 谢礼立, 张茂花. 阻尼对工程结构等延性地震抗力谱的影响分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2006, 38(10): 1705-1708. ZHAI Changhai, XIE Lili, ZHANG Maohua. Influence of damping on the spectrum of equal ductility seismic resistance of engineering structures[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006, 38(10): 1705-1708. [10] 冀昆, 温瑞智, 任叶飞. 中国抗震规范强震记录选取的初选条件研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2016(1):44-49. JI Kun, WEN Ruizhi, REN Yefei. Preliminary study on the selection of strong motion records for seismic codes in China[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2016(1):44-49. [11] Ji K, Bouaanani N, Wen R, et al. Correlation of Spectral Accelerations for Earthquakes in China[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2017, 107(3). [12] 胡进军, 李琼林, 吕景浩,等. 基于CMS的核电厂安全壳设计地震动确定方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018.37(24):38-45. HU Jinjun, LI Qionglin, LU Jinghao, et al. A study on the input ground motion of the containment vessel of nuclear power plants based on conditional mean spectrum [J]. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2018. 37(24):38-45. [13] Chopra, A K. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007. [14]倪诗阁. 结构抗震延性系数的确定方法[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 1984(2):11-16. NI Shige. Determination of seismic ductility factor of structures. Building Science Research of Sichuan, 1984(2):11-16. [15] 黄宗明, 孙勇. 决定单自由度体系弹塑性地震反应的结构参数分析[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报, 1996, 18(3):42-48. HUANG Zongming, SUN Yong. Analysis of structural parameters for determining elastoplastic seismic response of single degree of freedom system[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 1996, 18(3):42-48. [16] Loh C H, Ho R C. Seismic damage assessment based on different hysteretic rules[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1990, 19(5):753-771. [17] 谢礼立, 吕大刚. 结构动力学: 理论及其在地震工程中的应用[M]. 高等教育出版社, 2007. XIE Lili, LV Dagang. Structural Dynamics: Theory and its application in Earthquake Engineering[M]. Higher Education Press, 2007. [18] 翟长海. 最不利设计地震动的研究[D]. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2002. ZHAI Changhai. Research on the most unfavorable design ground motion[D]. Institute of engineering mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2002. [19]Zhai C H, Xie L L. A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 36(8):1009-1027. [20] 何毅良. 基于谱参数的RC框架结构输入地震动选取研究[D]. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2018. HE Yiliang. Selection of input ground motion for RC frame structures based on spectral parameters[D]. Institute of engineering mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2018.

PDF(1571 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/