考虑桩径效应的桥梁结构地震风险分析

PDF(2381 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (15) : 224-231.

论文

考虑桩径效应的桥梁结构地震风险分析

万华平1，卫志成2，苏雷3，任伟新4

作者信息 +

Seismic risk analysis of bridge structure considering pile diameter effect

WAN Huaping1, WEI Zhicheng2, SU Lei3, REN Weixin4

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

桩－土－结构相互作用是桥梁结构地震反应分析的重要问题，其中桩径效应不应忽略。以一座三跨连续梁桥为例，研究桩径效应对桥梁地震风险的影响。具体建立三种有限元模型：模型一是同时考虑桩－土－结构相互作用和桩径效应；模型二是考虑桩－土－结构相互作用，但没有考虑桩径效应；模型三是墩底固结的简化模型。通过增量动力分析方法计算桥梁结构的地震易损性曲线和地震风险曲线，对三种模型的计算结果进行对比分析。结果表明，同时考虑桩－土－结构相互作用和桩径效应的模型对应地震易损性与地震风险最高；墩底固结的模型对应地震易损性和地震风险最低。

Abstract

Pile-soil-structure interaction is an important problem in seismic response analysis of bridge structures, where pile diameter effect should not be ignored. Here, taking a three-span continuous beam bridge as an example, effects of pile diameter effect on bridge seismic risk was studied. Three kinds of finite element models of model1 simultaneously considering pile-soil-structure interaction and pile diameter effect, model2 considering pile-soil-structure interaction but not pile diameter effect and model 3 being a simplified model of pier bottom fixed were established. The seismic vulnerability curve and seismic risk curve of the bridge structure were calculated with the incremental dynamic analysis method. The contrastive analysis was performed for the calculation results of the three models. The results showed that model1 simultaneously considering pile-soil-structure interaction and pile diameter effect has the highest seismic vulnerability and seismic risk; model 3 with pier bottom fixed has the lowest seismic vulnerability and seismic risk.

导出引用

万华平，卫志成，苏雷，任伟新. 考虑桩径效应的桥梁结构地震风险分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(15): 224-231

WAN Huaping, WEI Zhicheng, SU Lei, REN Weixin. Seismic risk analysis of bridge structure considering pile diameter effect[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(15): 224-231

参考文献

［1］Applied Technology Council (ATC). Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines-program plan for new and existing buildings［R］. Washington， D.C.， USA： Federal Emergency Management Agency，2006.
［2］LUPOI A，FRANCHIN P，SCHOTANUS M. Seismic risk evaluation of RC bridge structures［J］. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics，2003，32(8)：1275-1290.
［3］PADGETT J E，DESROCHES R，NILSSON E. Regional seismic risk assessment of bridge network in Charleston， South Carolina［J］. Journal of Earthquake Engineering，2010，14(6)：918-933.
［4］钟剑，万华平，任伟新，等. 全概率理论斜拉桥地震风险分析［J］. 振动工程学报，2018，31(4)：654-661.
ZHONG Jian，WAN Huaping，REN Weixin，et al. Seismic risk analysis for cable stayed bridges based on total probability theorem［J］. Journal of Vibration Engineering，2018，31(4)：654-661.
［5］于晓辉. 钢筋混凝土框架结构的概率地震易损性与风险分析［D］. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2012.
［6］吕大刚，刘洋，于晓辉. 第二代基于性能地震工程中的地震易损性模型及正逆风概率风险分析［J］. 工程力学，2019，36(9)：1-11.
L Dagang，LIU Yang，YU Xiaohui. Seismic fragility models and forward-backward probabilistic risk analysis in second-generation performance-based earthquake engineering［J］. Engineering Mechanics，2019，36(9)：1-11.

［7］DUNNAVANT T W，O’NEILL M W. Experimental p-y model for submerged， stiff clay［J］. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1989，115(1)：95-114.
［8］AISSA M H，BOUZID D，BHATTACHARYA S. Monopile head stiffness for servicibility limit state calculations in assessing the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines［J］. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2018，12(3)：267-283.
［9］张海洋，刘润，袁宇，等. 海上大直径单桩基础p-y曲线修正［J］. 水利学报，2020，51(2)：201-211.
ZHANG Haiyang，LIU Run，YUAN Yu，et al. A modified p-y curve method for offshore large-diameter monopile foundations［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，2020，51(2)：201-211.
［10］ELGAMAL A，YAN Linjun，YANG Zhaohui，et al. Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground system［J］. Journal of Structural Engineering，2008，134(7)：1165-1176.
［11］FENG Zhiren，SU Lei，WAN Huaping，et al. Three-dimensional finite element modelling for seismic response analysis of pile-supported bridges［J］. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering，2019，15(12)：1-14.
［12］VAMVATSIKOS D，CORNELL C A. Incremental dynamic analysis［J］. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics，2002，31(3)：491-514.
［13］CORNELL C A，JALAYER F，HAMBURGER R O， et al. Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines［J］. Journal of Structural Engineering，2002，128(4)：526-533.
［14］ELLINGWOOD B R. Earthquake risk assessment of building structures［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety，2001，74(3)：251-262.
［15］FEMA 350. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings［S］. Washington， D.C.， USA： Federal Emergency Management Agency，2000. 
［16］BRADLEY B A，DHAKAL R P，CUBRINOVSKI M，et al. Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis［J］. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics，2007，36(14)：2211-2225.
［17］SU Lei，LU Jinchi，ELGAMAL A，et al. Seismic performance of a pile-supported wharf： Three-dimensional finite element simulation［J］. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2017，95：167-179.
［18］SU Lei，WAN Huaping，ABTAHI S，et al. Dynamic response of soil-pile-structure system subjected to lateral spreading: shaking table test and parallel finite element simulation［J］. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2020，57(4)：497-517.
［19］黄胜. 高烈度地震下隧道破坏机制及抗震研究［D］. 武汉：中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，2010.
［20］HWANG H，LIU Jingbo，CHIU Y H. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges［R］. Memphis， USA： Mid-America Earthquake Center，2001.
［21］张菊辉. 基于数值模拟的规则梁桥墩柱的地震易损性分析［D］. 上海：同济大学，2006.
［22］NIELSON B G. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones［D］. Atlanta， GA： Georgia Institute of Technology，2005.