基于Sobol&rsquo;法的可变形状空腔全局灵敏度分析

PDF(2301 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2) : 141-147.

论文

基于Sobol’法的可变形状空腔全局灵敏度分析

宁方立1,2，张畅通1,2，刘哲1,2，丁辉1,2，翟庆波1,2，韦娟3

作者信息 +

Global sensitivity analysis of a deformable cavity based on the Sobol’s method

NING Fangli1,2,ZHANG Changtong1,2,LIU Zhe1,2,DING Hui1,2,ZHAI Qingbo1,2,WEI Juan3

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

高速气流经过空腔结构产生的高强度空腔噪声极易诱发空腔内结构共振而导致腔内元器件声疲劳破坏。提出了一种可变形状空腔控制方法，该控制方法通过机械装置调节空腔前、后壁面的倾斜角度达到降低空腔噪声的目的；在Ma=0.85条件下，利用大涡模拟(LES)预测空腔内的流体流动，以可变形状空腔的前、后壁面的倾斜角度作为设计变量，以空腔底板表面噪声载荷的主模态幅值作为响应，利用基于MSE准则的Kriging方法建立二自由度可变形状空腔的代理模型，利用Sobol’法分析模型的全局灵敏度。发现，可变形状空腔的前、后壁面倾斜可以明显抑制空腔底板表面噪声载荷的主模态幅值，其中后壁面倾斜的全局灵敏度为前壁面倾斜的1.712倍，并且前、后壁面倾斜对空腔底板表面噪声载荷的主模态幅值的交互影响小。

Abstract

The high-intensity cavity noise generated by the high-speed airflow passing through the cavity structure can easily induce the cavity structure resonance and lead to the acoustic fatigue damage of the components in the cavity.Therefore, a deformable cavity control method was proposed, which can reduce the noise of the cavity by adjusting the tilt angle of the leading and rear wall of the cavity with mechanical devices.At the Mach number of 0.85, a large eddy simulation (LES) was used to predict the fluid flow in the cavity.Taking the inclination angles of the leading and rear wall of the deformable cavity as design variables and the main tonal noise as the response, a surrogate model of the deformable cavity was established using the Kriging method based on the MSE criterion, and then the global sensitivity of the model was analyzed by the Sobol’s method.It is found that the leading and rear wall tilt of the deformable cavity can significantly suppress the main tonal noise, the global sensitivity of the rear wall tilt is 1.712 times that of the leading wall tilt, and the interaction effect of the leading and rear wall tilt on the main tonal noise is small.

导出引用

宁方立1,2，张畅通1,2，刘哲1,2，丁辉1,2，翟庆波1,2，韦娟3. 基于Sobol’法的可变形状空腔全局灵敏度分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(2): 141-147

NING Fangli1,2,ZHANG Changtong1,2,LIU Zhe1,2,DING Hui1,2,ZHAI Qingbo1,2,WEI Juan3. Global sensitivity analysis of a deformable cavity based on the Sobol’s method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(2): 141-147

参考文献

[1] 余培汛,白俊强,郭博智,等. 剪切层形态对开式空腔气动噪声的抑制[J]. 振动与冲击，2015, 34(01): 156-164.
YU Pei-xun, BAI Jun-qiang, GUO Bo-zhi, et al. Suppression of aerodynamic noise by altering the form of shear layer in open cavity[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015,34(01):156-164.
[2] 刘俊,杨党国,王显圣,等. 基于URANS与DDES方法的空腔近场噪声数值研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(20): 154-159.
LIU Jun, YANG Dang-guo, WANG Xian-sheng, et al. Numerical simulation of near-field cavity noise by URANS and DDES[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(20): 154-159.
[3] 白海涛, 赖焕新. 基于三种亚格子模型的空腔振荡流动计算[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 42(1): 156-164.
BAI Hai-tao, LAI Huan-xin. Calculation of Oscillation Flow in Open Cavity Using Three Sulr-grid Scale Models[J]. Journal of East China University oI Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 42(1): 156-164.
[4] 刘俊, 蔡晋生, 杨党国, et al. 超声速空腔流动波系演化及噪声控制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11):18-36.
LIU Jun, CAI Jin-sheng, YANG Dang-guo, et al. Research progress on wave behavior and noise control for supersonic cavity flows[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(11):18-36.
[5] 张永昌, 徐宇工. 基于TR-PIV方法的格栅-空腔流动流场自激振荡空间特征研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(23):234-240.
ZHANG Yong-chang, XU Yu-gong. Spatial distribution characteristics of self-excited oscillations in a grille-cavity flow field based on TR-PIV method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(23):234-240.
[6] 周方奇, 杨党国, 王显圣,等. 前缘直板扰流对高速空腔的降噪效果分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(4): 133-143.
ZHOU Fang-qi, YANG Dang-guo, WANG Xian-sheng, et al. Effect of leading edge plate of high speed cavity noise control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(4): 133-143.
[7] Shaw L, Clapk R, Talmadge D. F-111 generic weapons bay acoustic environment[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 25(2):147-153.
[8] Ukeiley L S, Ponton M K, Seiner J M, et al. Suppression of pressure loads in cavity flows[J]. AIAA journal, 2004, 42(1): 70-79.
[9] Pey Y Y, Chua L P. Effects of trailing wall modifications on cavity wall pressure[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2014, 57(2014): 250-260.
[10] 吴继飞, 徐来武, 范召林, 等. 后壁倒角对开式空腔气动噪声抑制作用研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(5): 645-649.
WU Ji-fei, XU Lai-wu, FAN Zhao-lin, et al. Effect of chamfer rear-face angle on open cavity flow aero-acoustic noise suppression[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 645-649.
[11] 杨党国, 吴继飞, 罗新福. 零质量射流对开式空腔气动噪声抑制效果分析[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6):1007-1014.
YANG Dang-guo, WU Ji-fei, LUO Xin-fu. Investigation on Suppression Effect of Zero-net-mass-flux Jet on Aerodynamic Noise Inside Open Cavities[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(6):1007-1014.
[12] Huang X, Zhang X. Streamwise and spanwise plasma actuators for flow-induced cavity noise control[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2008, 20(037101):1070-6631.
[13] Yugulis K, Hansford S, Gregory J W, et al. Control of High Subsonic Cavity Flow Using Plasma Actuators[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 52(7):1542-1554.
[14] 王显圣,杨党国,刘俊,等.弹性空腔流致噪声/结构振动特性试验[J].航空学报,2017,38(07):182-191.
WANG Xian-sheng, YANG Dang-guo, LIU Jun, et al. Test on interactions between aeroacoustic noise and structural vibration in elastic cavity flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2017,38(07):182-191.
[15] 宁方立, 宁舜山, 石旭东, 等. 可变形状空腔噪声的数值仿真研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018 37(19): 231-238+258.
NING Fang-li, NING Shun-shan, SHI Xu-dong, et al. Numerical simulation for deformable cavity noise[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018 37(19): 231-238+258.
[16] Ning F L, Ning S S, Zhang C T, et al. Numerical Simulation Study on Aeroacoustic Characteristics within Deformable Cavities[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019,2019.
[17] Jong A D, Bijl H. Corner-Type Plasma Actuators for Cavity Flow-Induced Noise Control[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(1):33-42.
[18] Sampath P, Sinhamahapatra K P. Numerical analysis of characteristic features of shallow and deep cavity in supersonic flow[J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2016, 30(3): 231-255.
[19] Sun M B, Wang H B, Chen T, et al. Parametric study on self-sustained oscillation characteristics of cavity flameholders in supersonic flows[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 225(6): 597-618.
[20] Drikakis D. Advances in turbulent flow computations using high-resolution methods[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2003, 39(6):405-424.
[21] Chen X, Sandham N D, Zhang X. Cavity flow noise predictions[R]. Final Report for Mstarr DaRP, Southampton: University of Southampton, 2007.
[22] Lophaven S N, Nielsen H B, Sondergaard J, et al. A matlab kriging toolbox[R]. Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Technical Report No. IMM-TR-2002-12, 2002.
[23] 游海龙, 贾新章. 基于遗传算法的Kriging模型构造与优化[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2007(1):64-68.
You Hai-long, Jia Xin-zhang. The Construction and Optimization of Kriging Metamodel Based on Genetic Algorithms[J]. Journal of Computer-aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2007(1):64-68.
[24] 陈鹏, 李剑, 管涛. 基于PSO的Kriging相关模型参数优化[J]. 微电子学与计算机, 2009(4):178-181.
CHEN Peng, LI Jian, GUAN Tao. The Optimization of Parameters of Kriging Correlation Model Based on Particle Swarm Optimization[J]. MICRO ELECTRONICS & COMPUTER, 2009(4):178-181.
[25] 韩忠华. Kriging模型及代理优化算法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225.
HAN Zhong-hua. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: A review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11) : 3197-3225.
[26] Liu J, Han Z H, Song W P. Comparison of infill sampling criteria in kriging-based aerodynamic optimization[C]//28th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. 2012: 23-28.
[27] Sasena M J, Papalambros P, Goovaerts P. Exploration of metamodeling sampling criteria for constrained global optimization[J]. Engineering optimization, 2002, 34(3): 263-278.
[28] Sobol I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates[J]. Mathematics and computers in simulation, 2001, 55(1-3): 271-280.
[29] Bilal N. Implementation of Sobol’s method of global sensitivity analysis to a compressor simulation model[C]. International Compressor Engineering Conference, 2014, 2385.