十字交叉型地铁车站结构的振动台试验研究

PDF(1924 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9) : 142-151.

论文

十字交叉型地铁车站结构的振动台试验研究

于仲洋1,2，张鸿儒1,2，邱滟佳1,2，张然1,2，李昊1,2

作者信息 +

Shaking table tests for cross subway station structure

YU Zhongyang1,2, ZHANG Hongru1,2, QIU Yanjia1,2, ZHANG Ran1,2, LI Hao1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

随着近些年地下轨道交通的发展，十字交叉型地铁车站广泛的应用在实际工程中，了解并提高此类地铁车站的抗震性能具有重要意义。首次利用振动台试验的方法探究此类地铁车站结构，揭示了地震动在场地中的传播特性以及十字交叉型车站结构的地震响应特性，尤其是车站交叉换乘连接段对车站整体结构的抗震性能的影响。结果表明：地震波的传播受到场地特性影响明显，尤其是与场地卓越频率相近的部分，响应频谱被明显放大；随着地震动增强，场地的放大效应会有所减弱，但是场地的加速度响应放大谱的分布更加丰富，在拓宽场地响应频谱范围的同时也提高了地铁车站的地震风险。与此同时，在不同工况条件下车站结构模型的交叉换乘段对车站整体结构的影响基本在1.5倍的结构宽度以内，当距离超过该范围后，结构模型不再受其影响。与单体车站相比，此类车站交叉换乘连接段的底层结构更不利于抗震。上述结论可为了解并提高此类地铁车站的地震响应特性以及后续的抗震设计提供了有力支持。

Abstract

With development of underground rail transit in recent years, cross subway stations are widely applied in practical engineering.It is of great significance to understand and improve aseismic performance of such subway stations.Here, for the first time, the shaking table test method was used to study such a subway station structure to reveal propagation characteristics of ground motion in the station area, seismic response characteristics of the station structure, especially, the effects of the station’s cross transfer linkage segment on aseismic performance of the station’s overall structure.Test results showed that propagation of seismic wave is obviously affected by the site’s characteristics, especially, seismic wave’s part with frequencies close to the predominant frequency of the site, the site response spectrum is obviously amplified; with ground motion enhancing, the amplification effect of the site can be weakened, but the distribution of the acceleration response amplification spectrum of the site is more abundant, the spectrum range of the site response is widened and the seismic risk of the station rises; at the same time, under different working conditions, the influence of the interchange segment of the station structure model on the station overall structure is basically within 1.5 times of the structure width; when the distance exceeds this range, the structure model is no longer affected by the interchange segment of the station; compared to the station with a single body, the bottom structure of the cross type station is more unfavorable to earthquake resistance; the above conclusions can provide a strong support for understanding and improving seismic response characteristics of such subway stations and the subsequent aseismic designs.

导出引用

于仲洋1,2，张鸿儒1,2，邱滟佳1,2，张然1,2，李昊1,2. 十字交叉型地铁车站结构的振动台试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(9): 142-151

YU Zhongyang1,2, ZHANG Hongru1,2, QIU Yanjia1,2, ZHANG Ran1,2, LI Hao1,2. Shaking table tests for cross subway station structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(9): 142-151

参考文献

［1］林皋.地下结构抗震分析综述(上)［J］.世界地震工程, 1990(2): 1-10.
LIN Gao.Review of seismic analysis of underground structure (Part I) ［J］.World Earthquake Engineering, 1990(2): 1-10.
［2］林皋.地下结构抗震分析综述(下)［J］.世界地震工程, 1990(3): 1-10.
LIN Gao.Review of seismic analysis of underground structure (Part II) ［J］.World Earthquake Engineering, 1990(3): 1-10.
［3］NAKAMURA S, YOSHIDA N, IWATATE T.Damage to Daikai subway station during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake and its investigation ［J］.Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Committee of Earthquake Engineering, 1996(537): 287-295.
［4］UENISHIL K, SAKURAI S.Characteristic of the vertical seismic waves associated with the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan earthquake estimated from the failure of the Daikai underground station ［J］.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(6): 813-821.
［5］李廷春, 殷允腾.汶川地震中隧道结构的震害分析［J］.工程爆破, 2011, 17(1): 24-27.
LI Tingchun, YIN Yunteng.Seismic damage analysis of tunnel structure in Wenchuan earthquake ［J］.Engineering Blasting, 2011, 17(1): 24-27.
［6］李天斌.汶川特大地震中山岭隧道变形破坏特征及影响因素分析［J］.工程地质学报, 2008, 16(6):742-750．
LI Tianbin.Failure characteristics and influence factor analysis of mountain tunnels at epicenter zones of great Wenchuan earthquake ［J］.Journal of Engineering Geology, 2008, 16(6): 742-750.
［7］王梦恕.21世纪是隧道及地下空间大发展的年代.［J］.岩土工程界, 2006, 3(6):13-15.
WANG Mengsu.21st century is an era of great development of tunnels and underground space ［J］.Geotechnical Engineering World, 2006, 3(6): 13-15.
［8］王文晖.地下结构实用抗震分析方法及性能指标研究［D］.北京: 清华大学, 2013.
［9］张宇.T型交叉换乘车站地震反应和损伤分析［D］.北京: 北京交通大学, 2017.
［10］IWATATE T, KOBAYASHI Y, KUSU H, et al.Investigation and shaking table tests of subway structures of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake ［C］//Proceedings of 12th WCEE.New Zealand, 2000.
［11］陶连金, 王沛霖, 边金.典型地铁车站结构振动台模型试验［J］.北京工业大学学报, 2006, 32(9): 798-801.
TAO Lianjin, WANG Peilin, BIAN Jin.A shaking table test method on the representative subway station structure ［J］.Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2006, 32(9): 798-801.
［12］陈国兴, 庄海洋, 杜修力, 等.土-地铁车站结构动力相互作用的大型振动台模型试验研究［J］.地震工程与工程振动, 2007, 27(2): 171-176.
CHEN Guoxing, ZHUANG Haiyang, DU Xiuli, et al.Analysis of large-scale shaking table test of dynamic soil-subway station interaction ［J］.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(2): 171-176.
［13］孙海峰, 景立平, 王树伟, 等.地下结构地震破坏机理研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(增刊2): 3627-3635.
SUN Haifeng, JING Liping, WANG Shuwei, et al.Experimental study of seismic failure mechanism of underground structure ［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(Sup2): 3627-3635.
［14］李积栋, 陶连金, 安军海, 等.近远场地震动作用密贴交叉组合地铁车站振动台试验［J］.土木工程学报, 2015, 48(10): 30-37.
LI Jidong, TAO Lianjin, AN Junhai, et al.Shaking table test of the closely-attached intersecting subway station under far-field and near-field ground motion ［J］.China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(10): 30-37.
［15］CHEN S, TANG B Z, ZHAO K, et al.Seismic response of irregular underground structures under adverse soil conditions using shaking table tests［J］.Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 1031-1045.
［16］CHEN G, CHEN S, QI C Z, et al.Shaking table tests on a three-arch type subway station structure in a liquefiable soil ［J］.Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(6):1675-1701.
［17］KAWAMATA Y, NAKAYAMA M, TOWHATA I, et al.Large-scale shake table test on behavior of underground structure with the curved portion during an earthquake ［J］.Journal of Disaster Research, 2017, 12(5): 868-881.
［18］ZHUANG H Y, WANG X, MIAO Y, et al.Seismic responses of a subway station and tunnel in a slightly inclined liquefiable ground through shaking table test ［J］.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 371-385.
［19］CHEN S, ZHUANG H Y, YUAN J, et al.Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site: a case study ［J］.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 123: 173-184.
［20］韩建平, 聂闻锐.黄土地区地上两层地铁车站抗震性能振动台试验［J］.兰州理工大学学报, 2020, 46(2): 127-132.
HAN Jianping, NIE Wenrui.Shaking table test for anti-seismic performance of subway station in loess area with two floors above ground ［J］.Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2020, 46(2): 127-132.
［21］胡双平.无柱加腋地铁车站土-结构模型振动台试验［J］.建筑科学与工程学报, 2020, 37(4): 116-126.
HU Shuangping.Shaking table test of soil-structural model of non-column launched metro station ［J］.Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2020, 37(4): 116-126.
［22］王国波, 余淼坤, 袁明智, 等.十字换乘地铁车站结构地震响应分析［J］.岩土工程学报 2019, 41(7): 1227-1234.
WANG Guobo, YU Miaokun, YUAN Mingzhi, et al.Seismic response analysis of cross metro transfer station structure ［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(7): 1227-1234.
［23］王国波, 郝朋飞, 孙富学.地铁车站结构端部效应影响范围研究［J］.岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(8):1435-1445.
WANG Guobo, HAO Pengfei, SUN Fuxue.Spatial influence scope of end wall of metro station structures ［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(8):1435-1445.
［24］于仲洋, 张鸿儒.交叉换乘地铁车站地震特性及其设计方法［J］.东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1011-1018.
YU Zhongyang, ZHANG Hongru.Seismic characteristics and designs of cross transfer station ［J］.Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1011-1018.
［25］孙海峰, 景立平, 王宁伟, 等.振动台多功能叠层剪切箱研制［J］.岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(12): 2298-2506.
SUN Haifeng, JING Lipeng, WANG Ningwei, et al.Development of multifunctional laminar shear container for shaking table test ［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(12): 2498-2506.
［26］景立平, 孟宪春, 孙海峰, 等.三层地铁车站振动台试验的数值模拟［J］.地震工程与工程振动, 2012, 32(1): 100-107.
JING Lipeng, MENG Xianchun, SUN Haifeng, et al.Numerical simulation of three-story subway station shaking table test ［J］.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 32(1): 100-107.
［27］孙海峰, 景立平, 王树伟, 等.地下结构地震破坏机制试验研究［J］.岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(增刊2): 3627-3635.
SUN Haifeng, JING Lipeng, WANG Shuwei, et al.Experimental study of seismic failure mechanism of underground structure ［J］.Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(Sup2): 3627-3635.
［28］林皋, 朱彤, 林蓓.结构动力模型试验的相似设计［J］.大连理工大学学报, 2000, 1: 1-8.
LIN Gao, ZHU Tong, LIN Bei.Similarity technique for dynamic structural model test ［J］.Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2000, 1: 1-8.
［29］CHEN Z Y, CHEN W, LI Y Y, et al.Shaking table test of a multi-story subway station under pulse-like ground motions ［J］.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 82: 111-122.
［30］邵帅, 邵生俊, 马纯阳, 等.饱和砂土地铁车站的振动台试验研究［J］.世界地震工程, 2019, 35(4): 163-170.
SHAO Shuai, SHAO Shengjun, MA Chunyang, et al.Research on vibrating table model test of subway station in saturated sandy soil ［J］.World Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 35(4): 163-170.
［31］楼梦麟, 王文剑, 朱彤.土－结构体系振动台模型试验中土层边界影响问题［J］.地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(2): 30-36.
LOU Menglin, WANG Wenjian, ZHU Tong.Soil lateral boundary effect in shaking table model test of soil-structure system ［J］.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2000, 20(2): 30-36.