一种舰船低频冲击环境的新型测试原理与方法

PDF(1603 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8) : 110-115.

论文

计晨1，郭君2，冯麟涵1，郝宁2

作者信息 +

A new testing method for low frequency impact environment of ships

JI Chen1，GUO Jun2，FENG Linhan1，HAO Ning2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

舰船冲击环境是舰船设备抗冲击评估的基础输入数据，其最可靠的来源是实船抗冲击试验，其中低频冲击环境的测试工程上常采用低频振子、簧片仪等专用仪器，这些传感器存在过于笨重、仪器安装相对困难的问题，直接采用加速度计测试结果由于“零飘”导致误差大，其结果不可靠。为此，本文通过对低频冲击环境形成机理的分析，指出大型舰船低频冲击环境主要来源于舰船低频总振动，并提出一种基于实船抗冲击试验舰船总振动应变的间接测试方法。通过千吨级舰船实船的试验数据证明了该方法的有效性，加速度计实测数据与低频振子测得的数据相比，平均偏差为42.9%，新方法与低频振子测得的数据相比，平均偏差为12.6%。该技术与传统方法相比具有传感器安装简便、测点数目需求低和有效覆盖船长范围大的优势，对实船抗冲击试验的低频冲击环境测试具有重要的参考价值。

Abstract

When the accelerometer is used to test the low-frequency impact environment of ships, it is easy to produce "zero drift" effect, which leads to large error and unreliability of the results. Therefore, through the analysis of the formation mechanism of low frequency impact environment, this paper proposes an indirect test method based on the total vibration strain of ship shock trail. The validity of the proposed method is verified based on the test data of a real ship. Results show that the average error of the new method is 12.6% compared with the data measured by the low frequency oscillator. Compared with the traditional method, this technology has the advantages of simple sensor installation, low number of measurement points and large effective coverage of the ship length, which has important reference value for the low-frequency impact environment test of ship shock trail.

导出引用

计晨1，郭君2，冯麟涵1，郝宁2. 一种舰船低频冲击环境的新型测试原理与方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(8): 110-115

JI Chen1，GUO Jun2，FENG Linhan1，HAO Ning2. A new testing method for low frequency impact environment of ships[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(8): 110-115

参考文献

[1]Holmes P J. The dynamics of repeated impacts with a sinusoid ally vibrating inverse technique [J]. International Journal of impact Engineerring, 1982,8
[2]Rudolph J. Scavuzzo. Henry C .Pusey，Naval Shock Analysis and design[M]. Falls Church：SAVIAC/Booz. Allen and Hamilton，Inc.，2000.
[3]D .V .Balandin，N.N.Bolotnik，W.D.Pilkey，Review: Optimal Shock and Vibration Isolation[J]. Shock and Vibration, 1998.5:73-87.
[4]Zeng Z, Yan M, Zhao P, Zhang .Overview of mid-low frequency shock response spectrum measurement technology[J].Shipbuilding Technology,2016(04):30-33+41.in Chinese.
[5]Chen H,Pan J,Tang J, et al.Research on related technology of ship impact environment test under underwater non-contact explosion conditions[J].Computer Measurement and Control,2011,19(11):2635-2638.
[6]Cole R.H. Underwater explosions [M]. Princeton University Press: 1948.
[7] Wang J. Research on medium-low frequency impulse response spectrum measuring device [D]. Shenyang:Shenyang University of Technology, 2018.
[8]Nozato H , Ota A , Kokuyama W , et al. An enhanced primary shock calibration procedure to reduce the zero shift effect of piezoelectric transducers by using a virtual amplifier[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2016, 27(9):095007.
[9]Edwards T S. An improved wavelet correction for zero shifted accelerometer data[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2003, 10(3): 159-167.
[10]于大鹏，汪玉，杜俭业. 舰艇冲击响应数据滤波频率选取方法分析[J].振动与冲击，2013,32（14）：153-158.
Dapeng Yu, Yu Wang, Jianye Du. Choosing filtering frequency of warship shock response data[J].Journal of vibration and shock，2013,32（14）：153-158.
[11]王军. 浮动冲击平台冲击动力特性研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2015.
Jun Wang. Research on the impact dynamic characteristics of the floating shock platform[D]. Harbin： Harbin Engineering University, 2015.
[12]温岩岩. 舰船水下爆炸冲击环境预报的组合模型方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨工程大学，2017.
Yanyan Wen. Research on combinatorial model method of forecasting impact environment of ships subjected to underwater explosion[D]. Harbin： Harbin Engineering University, 2017.
[13]郭建军. 船体水下爆炸冲击动弯矩理论与试验研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2016.
Jianjun Guo. Theory and test research on shock vibration bending moment of ship subjected to underwater explosion load[D]. Harbin：Harbin Engineering University, 2016.
[14]赵勋.舰船低频冲击环境修正方法及其在轴系抗冲击中的应用[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学. 2019
Xun Zhao. Correction method of ship low-frequency impact environment and its application in shafting impact resistance[D].Harbin：Harbin Engineering University, 2019.
[15]姚熊亮.船体振动[M].哈尔滨工程大学出版社，2004:140-158.
Xiongliang Yao. Hull vibration[M]. Harbin：Harbin Engineering University, 2004:140-158.
[16] R.克拉夫，J.彭津.结构动力学[M]. 高等教育出版社：2010.
Ray W.Clough. Structural Dynamics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2010.
[17]李德葆,陆秋海,秦权.承弯结构的曲率模态分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2002(02):224-227.
Debao Li, Qiuhai Lu, Quan Qin. Curvature modal analysis for bending structures[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology),2002(02):224-227.
[18]李德葆.实验应变／应力模态分析若干问题的进展评述[J].振动与冲击,1996(01):13-17+93.
Debao Li. A general review on several fundamental points of experimental strain/stress modal analysis[J]. Journal of vibration and shock,1996(01):13-17+93.