基于全局敏感性（GS）的模型更新混合模拟方法可以有效提升混合模拟精度并拥有较高的计算效率，然而该方法易陷入局部最优值。为解决此问题，在GS方法的基础上引入了动量和自适应步长的概念，提出了基于全局敏感性的自适应（GS-A）模型更新混合模拟方法。以钢框架模型为例，对8个本构参数和模型几何参数进行参数识别，利用均匀设计试验方法，建立11个模型更新案例，分别进行了不更新、GS方法和GS-A方法的数值模拟分析。33组数值模拟案例参数识别过程、位移时程的对比分析表明：GS-A方法相对于GS方法，解决了参数组合陷入局部最优的问题，具有较高参数识别的精度和稳定性，提升了模型更新效果。
Abstract
The model updating for hybrid simulation method based on global sensitivity analysis (GS) can effectively improve the accuracy of hybrid simulation with high computing efficiency. However, this always makes it fall into the local optimal value. To address this issue, this paper introduces momentum and adaptive step size, and proposes an adaptive (GS-A) model updating hybrid simulation method based on global sensitivity analysis. The steel frame model is used as the analysis object, and the eight parameters including both the constitutive and model geometric ones are identified. The uniform design test method is used to establish 11 model update cases and numerical simulations were performed for the hybrid simulation with no updating, GS method and GS-A method, respectively. The parameter identification process, displacement time course and hysteresis curves of the 33 sets of numerical simulation cases were analyzed and compared. The results show that the GS-A method, compared with the GS method, solves the problem of the parameters falling into the local optimal value , performs higher accuracy and stability of parameter identification, and improved the model updating effect.
关键词
抗震试验 /
混合模拟 /
模型更新 /
均匀设计 /
敏感性分析
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
seismic test /
hybrid simulation /
model updating /
uniform design /
sensitivity analysis
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Hakuno M, Shidawara M, Hara T. Dynamic destructive test of a cantilever beam, controlled by an analog-computer[C]//Proceedings of the Japan society of civil engineers. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1969: 1-9.
[2] Takanashi K, Udagawa K, Seki M, et al. Seismic failure analysis of structures by computer-pulsator on-line system[J]. Japan Institute of Industrial Science, 1974: 13-25.
[3] Yang W. Substructure Online Test Using Real-Time Hysteresis Modeling with Neural Network[J]. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 2008,24(3):53-60.
[4] Elanwar H H, Elnashai A S. Application of in-test model updating to earthquake structural assessment[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 20(1): 62-79.
[5] Elanwar H H, Elnashai A S. Framework for online model updating in earthquake hybrid simulations[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 20(1): 80-100.
[6] Yang G, Wu B, Ou G, et al. HyTest: platform for structural hybrid simulations with finite element model updating[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2017, 112: 200-210.
[7] Mei Z, Wu B, Bursi O S, et al. Hybrid simulation of structural systems with online updating of concrete constitutive law parameters by unscented Kalman filter[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2018, 25(2): e2069.
[8] Zhong W, Chen Z. Model updating method for hybrid simulation based on global sensitivity analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2021, 50(14): 3792-3813.
[9] 王涛, 李勐, 孟丽岩, 等. 统计容积卡尔曼滤波器的混合试验模型更新方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022(011):041.
WANG Tao, LI Meng, MENG Liyan, et al. Hybrid test model updating method based on statistical cubature Kalman filter[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022(011):041.
[10] 王涛, 李勐, 孟丽岩, 等. 自复位摩擦耗能支撑结构多尺度模型更新数值混合模拟方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(17):25-34.
WANG Tao, LI Meng, MENG Liyan, et al. Multi-scale model updating numerical hybrid simulation method for self-centering friction energy dissipation braced structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(17):25-34.
[11] 陈再现, 钟炜彭. 基于全局敏感性的模型更新混合模拟方法[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021,42(02):231-238.
CHEN Zaixian, ZHONG Weipeng. Model updating method for hybrid simulation based on global sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2021,42(02):231-238.
[12] 钟炜彭. 基于全局敏感性的模型更新混合模拟方法[D]. 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020:33.
ZHONG Weipeng. Model updating method for hybrid simulation based on global sensitivity analysis[D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020:33.
[13] 方开泰. 均匀试验设计的理论、方法和应用——历史回顾[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2004(03):69-80.
FANG Kaitai. The theory, method and application of uniform experimental design -- a historical review[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2004(03):69-80.
[14] 陈再现,钟炜彭,王纪伟. 基于动力时程分析的模型更新混合模拟方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020,53(S2):137-142.
CHEN Zaixian, ZHONG Weipeng, WANG Jiwei. Model updating method for hybrid simulation based on dynamic time history analysis[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020,53(S2):137-142.
[15] Sobol I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1-3): 271-280.
[16] 陈再现, 韩光, 王焕定, 吴斌. 传统界面处理的子结构拟动力试验误差分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014,34(S1):657-662.
CHEN Zaixian, HAN Guang, WANG Huanding, WU Bing. Error study on conventional interface scheme of substructure pseudo-dynamic testing method[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2014,34(S1):657-662.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1372 KB)
