复杂城区场地粗糙度指数的风洞试验研究

周文军1, 郑世雄2, 祝东红1, 沈国辉2

振动与冲击 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 149-154.

PDF(2957 KB)
PDF(2957 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 149-154.
土木工程

复杂城区场地粗糙度指数的风洞试验研究

  • 周文军1,郑世雄2,祝东红1,沈国辉*2
作者信息 +

Wind tunnel test studying on roughness index of complex urban sites

  • ZHOU Wenjun1, ZHENG Shixiong2, ZHU Donghong1, SHEN Guohui*2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对某复杂城区场地进行风速测试的风洞试验,获得24个风向角的平均风速剖面并拟合得到粗糙度指数,以此确定各个风向角的地面粗糙度类别,同时研究了上游迎风区域扇形角度对试验结果的影响。结果表明,迎风区域为城区与山地混合地貌时更容易发展成C类地貌;24个风向角的粗糙度指数值拟合优度均大于0.95,说明指数律能很好地表达该复杂城区地貌的平均风速剖面;迎风区域扇形角度对城市地面粗糙度类别有较大影响,70°~180°扇形角度时的平均风速剖面和拟合的指数均非常接近,而30°~60°迎风角度时指数变小,可以确定上游扇区迎风角度70°为最小扇区角度,该值与ASCE和EN规范的90°规定值比较接近,建筑结构荷载规范建议180°迎风半圆的范围过大。

Abstract

Wind tunnel tests were conducted on a complex urban landform to obtain the mean wind velocity profile of 24 wind directions and fit the roughness power index to determine the ground roughness categories for each wind direction angle. Meanwhile, the influence of the upwind sector angle on the test results was investigated. The results indicate that upwind areas with mixed urban and mountainous landforms are more likely to develop into Category C landforms. The goodness of fit of the roughness power index values for 24 wind directions is greater than 0.95, indicating that the exponential law can effectively express the mean wind velocity profile of complex urban landforms. The upwind sector angle has a significant impact on the classification of urban ground roughness. The average wind speed profile and fitted power index are very close when the sector angle is between 70°and 180°, while the index decreases when the angle is between 30°and 60°. It can be determined that the minimum angle of the upstream sector is 70°, which is close to the 90° specified in ASCE and EN specifications. The upstream sector value of 180°, which is equal to a semicircle, regulated in the Load Code for the Design of Building Structures, seems to be too large.

关键词

指数律 / 地貌粗糙度 / 风洞试验 / 风向角 / 迎风夹角

Key words

exponential law / terrain roughness / wind tunnel test / wind angle / upwind sector angles

引用本文

导出引用
周文军1, 郑世雄2, 祝东红1, 沈国辉2. 复杂城区场地粗糙度指数的风洞试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2025, 44(5): 149-154
ZHOU Wenjun1, ZHENG Shixiong2, ZHU Donghong1, SHEN Guohui2. Wind tunnel test studying on roughness index of complex urban sites[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2025, 44(5): 149-154

参考文献

[1]  建筑结构荷载规范 GB 50009-2012 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
Load code for the design of building structures: GB 50009-2012[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2012.
[2]  李颖. 基于试验和数值计算的城市地面粗糙高度确定研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2022. 
LI Ying. Determination of urban ground roughness height based on test and numerical calculation[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022.
[3]  于舰涵. 工程场址处风环境的数值模拟和试验研究[D].成都:西南交通大学, 2021.
YU Jianhan. Numerical simulation and experimental study on wind environment at construction sites[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021.
[4]  YU Jianhan, LI Mingshui, STATHOPOULOS Ted. Urban exposure upstream fetch and its influence on the formulation of wind load provisions[J]. Building and Environment, 2021, 203:108072.
[5]  YU Jianhan, STATHOPOULOS Ted, LI Mingshui.  Exposure factors and their specifications in current wind codes and standards[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76:107207.
[6]  全涌, 陈泂翔, 杨淳, 等. 大型中心城市平均风速剖面特性的风洞试验[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,48(02):185-190.
QUAN Yong, Chen Guixiang, Yang Chun, et al. Wind tunnel experiments of the mean wind profile characteristics over a large central city[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2020,48 (02): 185-190
[7]  张鑫鑫, 李波, 张石, 等. 基于北京中心城区实测的城市边界层风场特性[J].建筑结构学报, 2022, 43(03):109-117.
ZHANG Xinxin, Li Bo, Zhang Shi, et al. Characteristics of wind field in urban boundary layer based on measured data in central Beijing[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (03): 109-117
[8]  郅伦海, 姜舒亚. 多国规范城市地貌风特性关键参数的对比研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2014, 36(04):100-105.
ZHI Lunhai, Jiang Shuya. Comparative study of major international wind codes for wind characteristics over urban area[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2014,36 (04): 100-105.
[9]  黄斌, 李昊, 董金爽, 等. 六旋翼无人机测风系统实测海岛地区风剖面[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023,50(05):102-113.
HUANG Bin, Li Hao, Dong Jinshuang, et al. Wind profile in island areas measured by a wind measurement system of six-rotor UAV[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science Edition), 2023,50 (05): 102-113.
[10] 楼文娟, 周为政, 刘炯, 等. 西藏高原风场实测及非平稳风特性研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023,53(04):575-584.
LOU Wenjuan, Zhou Weizheng, Liu Jiong, et al. Wind field measurements in Tibetan Plateau and the study of nonststionary wind characteristics[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 53(04):575-584.
[11] 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准JTG/T 338-2014[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
Standard for wind tunnel test of buildings and structures JTG/T 338-2014[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2014.
[12] 姜咏涵,沈国辉,余世策, 等. 带竖向肋条高层建筑风荷载的测力测压对比. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(5):115-124.
JIANG Yonghan, SHEN Guohui, YU Shice, et al. Comparison of wind loads on high-rise buildings with vertical ribs obtained by force balance and pressure measuring tests[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45(5):115-124.
[13] 沈国辉, 翁文涛, 王轶文, 等. 某复杂山体的三维风场特征研究. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(4):75-80.
SHEN Guohui, WENG Wentao, WANG Yiwen, et al. A study on three-dimensional wind field characteristics of s complex hill[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(4):75-80.
[14] AIJ 2004 Recommendations for loads on buildings[S]. Tokyo:Architectural Institute of Japan, 2004.
[15] ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures[S]. Virginia:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2022.
[16] European Standard EN1991-1-4, actions on structures[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004.

PDF(2957 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/