宽厚比为2:1的圆角矩形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应试验研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(20)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2832 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要矩形断面在实际工程中应用广泛，对其角部进行圆角化处理可有效减小风荷载并改善风致振动性能，然而圆角矩形断面的气动特性存在明显的雷诺数效应。为研究宽厚比为2:1的圆角矩形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应，减小在这类断面结构的风荷载和风致振动分析中因雷诺数原因引起的误差，对5种不同圆角率(0.1、0.2、0.3、0.4和0.5)的刚性模型进行了测压风洞试验，试验雷诺数范围为0.8×105~3.6×105。通过风洞试验得到并分析了不同圆角率矩形断面的平均阻力系数、平均风压系数和斯特罗哈数随雷诺数的变化规律，并与标准矩形断面进行对比。研究结果表明：不同于标准矩形断面，5种圆角矩形断面的气动特性均表现了一定的雷诺数效应，这种雷诺数效应随圆角率的增大先增强后减弱，当圆角率为0.2时最强，其在雷诺数为2.8×105时发生了明显跳跃；不同圆角矩形断面的平均阻力系数均随雷诺数的增加而减小。与其它位置相比，圆角矩形断面侧面和圆角位置处的风压系数受雷诺数影响更明显，其中圆角位置处最为显著。圆角矩形断面的斯特罗哈数在圆角率为0.1时基本稳定在0.22左右，圆角率为0.2时在跳跃前后分别在0.24和0.31附近，在其它圆角率时则随雷诺数的增加先增大后稳定。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘小兵1
	2
	3
	田学东3
	姜会民3
	杨群1
	2
	3

关键词 ：矩形断面, 圆角率, 气动特性, 雷诺数效应, 风洞试验

Abstract：Rectangular prisms are widely used in practical engineering. Rounding corner treatments can effectively reduce the wind load and improve wind-induced vibration performance. However, the aerodynamic characteristics of rectangular prisms with round corners experience an obvious Reynolds number effect. In order to study the Reynolds number effect of aerodynamic characteristics of 2:1 rectangular prism with round corners and reduce the error caused by Reynolds number in the analysis of wind load and wind-induced vibration of such prism structure, pressure-measured wind tunnel tests were carried out on five rigid models with different rounded corner ratios (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5). The Reynolds number ranges from 0.8×105 to 3.6×105. The mean drag coefficients, mean wind pressure coefficients, and Strouhal number of rectangular prisms with different rounded corner ratios were obtained and analyzed by wind tunnel test, and compared with the standard rectangular prism. The results show that different from the standard rectangular prism, the aerodynamic characteristics of the five rectangular prisms with round corners show a certain Reynolds number effect, which increases first and then decreases with the increase of the rounded corner ratio. The Reynolds number effect is the strongest when the rounded corner ratio is 0.2, and the obvious jump occurs when the Reynolds number is 2.8×105. The mean drag coefficients of different rectangular prisms with round corners decrease with the increase of the Reynolds number. Compared with other positions, the mean wind pressure coefficients at the side face and corner positions of the rectangular prisms with round corners are more obviously affected by Reynolds number, and the corner positions are the most obvious. The Strouhal number of the rectangle prisms with round corners is basically stable around 0.22 when the rounded corner ratio is 0.1, and around 0.24 and 0.31 before and after the jump when the rounded corner ratio is 0.2. At other rounded corner ratios, it increases first and then stabilizes with the increase of Reynolds number.

Key words： rectangular prism rounded corner ratio aerodynamic characteristics Reynolds number effect wind tunnel test

收稿日期: 2022-07-19 出版日期: 2023-04-15

引用本文:

刘小兵1,2,3，田学东3，姜会民3，杨群1,2,3. 宽厚比为2:1的圆角矩形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(7): 1-7.
LIU Xiaobing1,2,3, TIAN Xuedong3, JIANG Huimin3, YANG Qun1,2,3. Experimental study on Reynolds number effect of aerodynamic characteristics of rounded rectangular prism with width-thickness ratio of 2∶1. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2023, 42(7): 1-7.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V42/I7/1

[1] LI Y, TIAN X, TEE K F, et al. Aerodynamic Treatments for Reduction of Wind Loads on High-rise Buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172: 107-115.
[2] DALGLEISH W A. Symposium on Full Scale Measurement of Wind Effects on Tall Building and Other Structure[J]. Journal of Industrial Aerodynamics, 1974, 1: 13-22.
[3] SCANLAN R H. Airfoil and Bridge Deck Flutter Derivatives[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div, 1971, 97(6): 1171-1737.
[4] NORBERG C. Flow around Rectangular Cylinders: Pressure Forces and Wake Frequencies[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 49(1-3): 187-196.
[5] 庄翔, 郑毅敏, 郑晓芬, 等. 不同圆角率下矩形高层建筑风荷载特性[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(s1): 1-8.
ZHUANG Xiang, ZHENG Yi-min, ZHENG Xiao-fen, et al. Wind Load Characteristics of Rectangular High-rise Buildings with Various Rounded Corner Ratios[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018, 39(s1): 1-8.
[6] JOHN D H. Wind Loading of Structures[M]. New York：CRC Press, 2015.
[7] 杨群, 刘庆宽, 韩瑞, 等. 不同圆角率的方形断面气动特性的雷诺数效应[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(04): 150-156.
YANG Qun, LIU Qing-kuan, HAN Rui, et al. Reynolds Number Effect of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Square Prism with Different Rounded Corner Ratios[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(04): 150-156.
[8] 杨群, 刘庆宽, 孙亚松, 等. 圆角方形断面气动特性试验[J]. 振动.测试与诊断, 2020, 40(01): 140-147+208.
YANG Qun, LIU Qing-kuan, SUN Ya-song, et al. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Square Prism with Rounded Corner[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2020, 40(01): 140-147+208.
[9] 王新荣, 顾明. 角部处理的二维方柱风压分布特性的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(07): 79-88.
WANG Xin-rong, GU Ming. Experiment Study on Wind Pressure Distributions of 2-D Square Prisms with Various Corner Treatments[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2016, 49(7): 79-88.
[10] CAO Y, TAMURA T. Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Rounded-corner Square Cylinder in Shear Flow at Subcritical and Supercritical Reynolds Numbers[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 82: 473-491.
[11] HINSBERG N P V, SCHEWE G, JACOBS M. Experiments on the Aerodynamic Behaviour of Square Cylinders with Rounded Corners at Reynolds Numbers up to 12 Million[J]. Journal of Fluids & Strucftures, 2017, 74(C):214-233.
[12] CARASSALE L, ANDREA F, MICHELA M B. Experimental Investigation on the Aerodynamic Behavior of Square Cylinders with Rounded Corners[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 44: 195-204.
[13] DELANY N K, SORENSEN N E. Low-speed Drag of Cylinders of Various Shapes[M]. Washington DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953.
[14] 王新荣, 顾明, 全涌. 圆角处理的断面宽厚比为2:1的二维矩形柱体气动力系数的雷诺数效应研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(01): 64-71.
WANG Xin-rong, GU Ming, QUAN Yong. Experiment Study of Reynolds Number Effects on Aerodynamic Forces for 2:1 Rectangular Prisms with Various Rounded Corners[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(01): 64-71.
[15] 王新荣, 顾明. 雷诺数对不同圆角率3:1二维矩形柱体气动力的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(05): 693-698.
WANG Xin-rong, GU Ming. Reynolds Bumber Effects on Aerodynamic Force Coefficients of 3:1 Rectangular Prisms with Various Rounded Corners[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2015, 43(05): 693-698. (in Chinese))
[16] KUBO Y, MIYAZAKI M. Effects of End Plates and Blockage of Structural Members on Drag Forces[J]. Joumal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1989, 32(3): 329.
[17] MIYATA T, MIYAZAKI M. Turbulence Eficets on Acrodynamic Response of Rectangular Bluff Cylinders[M]. Wind Engineering, 1980: 631-642.
[18] 王新荣. 典型超高层建筑结构气动特性的雷诺数效应研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2016
WANG Xin-rong. Reynolds Number Effect on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Typical Super-tall Buildings [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2016: 51-52.
[19] 曾加东, 李明水, 张志田, 等.不同长宽比矩形高层建筑的分离再附流动特性[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(04): 780-788.
ZENG Jia-dong, LI Ming-shui, ZHANG Zhi-tian, et al. Separation-reattachment Flows Characteristics of Rectangular High-rise Buildings with Different Side Ratios[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(04): 780-788.
[20] 王新荣, 顾明. 圆角处理对二维矩形柱体模型表面风压频域特性的影响研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(07): 59-66.
WANG Xin-rong, GU Ming. Effects of Corner Rounding Modification on Frequency Domain Characteristics of Pressure on 2D Rectangular Prisms[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(07): 59-66.