地下拱形结构爆炸响应计算二维和三维模型比较

洪 武;徐 迎;金丰年;范华林;

振动与冲击 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9) : 142-147.

PDF(2613 KB)
PDF(2613 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9) : 142-147.
论文

地下拱形结构爆炸响应计算二维和三维模型比较

  • 洪 武1,2,徐 迎1,金丰年1,范华林2, 3
作者信息 +

A comparative study of buried arching structure response to blast load with 2D and 3D numerical simulations

  • HONG Wu 1, 3, FAN Hua-lin 2, 3, JIN Feng-nian 1, XU Ying 1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

数值计算是研究地下拱形结构在爆炸荷载作用下动力响应问题的一种较好方法,数值计算过程中将三维(3D)模型简化为二维(2D)模型能提高数值计算效率,同时也会造成一定的计算误差。为了研究二维计算模型能否等效三维计算模型以及等效的前提条件和范围,采用数值计算分别对3D模型和2D模型爆炸冲击作用下地下拱形结构动力响应进行比较分析。计算结果表明:在两种计算模型中,自由场压力峰值的计算结果在装药周围差异较大,随着装药距离的增加趋于吻合;在2D模型中拱形结构的约束条件被增强,导致2D模型计算得到的应力、应变和质点振动速度偏小;当比例爆距大于一定值时2D模型和3D模型的计算结果吻合较好,计算表明该临界值为临界比例距离为2.76 m/kg1/3。

Abstract

Numerical simulation is an effective way to analyze blast response of underground protective arches. The efficiency of the numerical method is weakened when a three-dimensional (3D) structure is simplified as a two-dimensional (2D) structure. A comparative study of blast response of buried arches with 2D and 3D models was carried out. In 2D model, restraints to the arch are strengthened by the model and responses, including strains, stresses and vibration velocities, should be under-estimated. It is found that the computer results for the free field and structure responses by 2D and 3D model could agree well just on the condition when the blast scaled distance beyond a range. To the buried arches, the critical scaled distance is 2.76 m/kg1/3.


关键词

地下拱形结构 / 爆炸 / 二维数值模拟方法 / 三维数值模拟方法

Key words

Underground protective arches / explosion / 2D numerical simulation / 3D numerical simulation.

引用本文

导出引用
洪 武;徐 迎;金丰年;范华林;. 地下拱形结构爆炸响应计算二维和三维模型比较[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(9): 142-147
HONG Wu;;FAN Hua-lin;;JIN Feng-nian;XU Ying . A comparative study of buried arching structure response to blast load with 2D and 3D numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(9): 142-147

PDF(2613 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/