考虑双参数的公路隧道易损性及概率地震损失

苏琪,范进

振动与冲击 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (13) : 235-241.

PDF(1618 KB)
PDF(1618 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (13) : 235-241.
论文

考虑双参数的公路隧道易损性及概率地震损失

  • 苏琪,范进
作者信息 +

Vulnerability and probabilistic seismic loss of highway tunnel considering two parameters

  • SU Qi, FAN Jin
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

研究高速公路隧道基于双地震动强度参数的易损性及概率地震经济损失,对震前抗震防灾及震后急救修复意义重大。本文建立了高速公路隧道设计基准期内概率地震经济损失评估框架,引入双地震动强度参数,采用增量动力法进行了易损性分析,得到的易损性曲面与经验易损性曲线进行对比,验证了本文所建模型及易损性曲面的合理性。以此为基础,评估了隧道设计基准期内的概率地震经济损失。结果表明:建立的基于双地震动强度参数下的易损性曲面能更准确地反映结构损伤,在高速公路隧道设计基准期内,轻微损伤造成的概率地震经济损失占比最大,中等损伤次之。本文提出的隧道概率地震经济损失评估框架可对高速公路隧道地震经济损失评估提供参考。

Abstract

The research on the fragility analysis and probabilistic seismic economic loss of highway tunnel based on double intensity measures is significant for pre-earthquake earthquake prevention and post-earthquake emergency repair. In this paper, the evaluation framework of probabilistic seismic economic loss in the whole life cycle of highway tunnel is established, the double intensity measures are introduced, the fragility analysis is carried out by incremental dynamic analysis method. The comparison between the analytical fragility surface and the empirical fragility curve verifies the rationality of the model and the fragility surface established in this paper. On this basis, the probabilistic seismic economic losses in the whole life cycle of tunnel are evaluated. The results show that the fragility surface based on double intensity measures can reflect the structural damage more accurately, and the probabilistic economic loss caused by slight damage is the largest during the whole life cycle of highway tunnel, followed by moderate damage. The framework of tunnel probabilistic seismic economic loss assessment proposed in this paper can provide reference for highway tunnel seismic economic loss assessment.

关键词

高速公路隧道 / 地震动强度参数 / 增量动力分析 / 易损性曲面 / 概率地震经济损失

Key words

highway tunnel / intensity measure / incremental dynamic analysis / fragility surface / probabilistic economic loss.

引用本文

导出引用
苏琪,范进. 考虑双参数的公路隧道易损性及概率地震损失[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(13): 235-241
SU Qi, FAN Jin. Vulnerability and probabilistic seismic loss of highway tunnel considering two parameters[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(13): 235-241

参考文献

[1] 苏木标,井海明,戎密仁.铁路隧道地震灾害损失评估技术研究[J].铁道学报,2013,35(11):98-105.
SU Mubiao, JING Haiming, RONG Miren. Research on technology of earthquake disaster loss assessment for railway tunnels[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society,2013,35(11):98-105.
[2] 赵晓勇,杨其新,范刚.隧道震损快速评估方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015, 35(4): 164-70.
ZHAO Xiaoyong, YANG Qixin, FAN Gang. The research on seismic damage rapid assessment of tunnel[J].earthquake engineering and engineering dynamics,2015, 35(4): 164-70.
[3] Deco A, Bocchini P , Dan M F. A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2013, 42(10):1469-1487.
[4] Yeow T Z. Building-specific seismic resilience assessment frameworks considering content sliding and injury. 2017.
[5] Dong Y,Frangopol D M, Saydam D. Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards[J]. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2013, 42(10).
[6] Hamburger RO, Hooper J, Sabol T, et al. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings (FEMA 350)[J]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
[7] JTG 2232-2019,公路隧道抗震设计规范[S].
JTG 2232-2019, Code for seismic design of highway tunnels[S].
[8] 林庆利,林均岐,刘金龙.汶川地震公路桥梁易损性研究[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(04):110-118+126.
Lin Qingli, Lin Junqi, Liu Jinlong. Study on vulnerability of Highway Bridges in Wenchuan earthquake[J].Vibration and shock,2017,36(04):110-118+126.
[9] 张建辉,黄忠凯,刘祥勇,等. 基于矢量地震动强度参数的隧道结构易损性分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2022,44(5):57-66.
ZHANG Jianhui, HUANG Zhongkai, LIU Xiangyong, et al.Fragility analysis of tunnel structures based on the vector-valued intensity measures[J].Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering(English and Chinese),2022,44(5):57-66..
[10] 李杰, 李国强. 地震工程学导论[M]. 地震出版社, 1992.
Li Jie, Li Guoqiang.Introduction to earthquake Engineering [M].Seismological Press, 1992.
[11] Rathje E M , Abrahamson N A , Bray J D . Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions[J]. 1998, 124(2):150-0.
[12] Shome N . Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures[M]. Stanford University, 1999.
[13] 冯莉,樊燕燕,李子奇,等. 高速铁路连续梁桥全寿命周期概率地震损失分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2020,(04):815-822.
FENG Li, FANYanyan, LIZiqi, et al.Probabilistic whole life cycle seismic loss analysis of high-speed railway continuous girder bridge[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020,(04):815-822.
[14] 董正方,王君杰,姚毅超.深埋盾构隧道结构抗震设计方法评价[J].振动与冲击,2012,31(19):79-85.
Dong Zhengfang, Wang Junjie, Yao Yichao. Evaluation of Seismic Design method of Deep-buried Shield Tunnel structure[J].Vibration and shock,2012,31(19):79-85.
[15] 董正方,刘淦之,曾繁凯,康帅.基于修正IDA法的隧道地震易损性分析[J].振动与冲击,2021,40(17):106-115+166.
Dong Zhengfang, Liu Yizhi, Zeng Fankai, Kang Shuai. Seismic vulnerability analysis of tunnel based on modified IDA method[J].Vibration and shock,2021,40(17):106-115+166.
[16] 梅贤丞,崔臻,盛谦. 近断层/远场地震动作用下隧道结构易损性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(02):344-354.
MEI Xiancheng, CUI Zhen, SHENG Qian.Research on vulnerability of tunnel structures subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motions[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2021,40(02):344-354.
[17] 陈兴涛. 山岭隧道地震破坏模式及其性能指标研究[D].重庆交通大学,2019.
CHEN Xingtao.Mountain tunnel earthquake damage mode and its performance index research[D].Chongqing Jiaotong University,2019.
[18] Andreotti G, Lai C G. Use of fragility curves to assess the seismic vulnerability in the risk analysis of mountain tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91(103008):1-19.
[19] Alliance A L. Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: Part 1: Guideline[J]. American Lifelines Alliance, 2001.
[20] Kafali C, Grigoriu M. Seismic fragility analysis: Application to simple linear and nonlinear systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2007, 36(13):1885-1900.
[21] Cornell C A. Risk-based structural design[C].Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1994: 11-12.
[22] Hamburger R, Bachman R, Heintz J, et al. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1, Methodology [J]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.
[23] GB/T 24336-2009, 生命线工程地震破坏等级划分[S].
GB/T 24336-2009,Classification of earthquake damage to lifeline engineering[S].
[24] GB/T 18208.4-2011.地震现场工作第4部分:灾害直接损失评估[S].
GB/T 18208.4-2011.Post-earthquake field works-Part4:Assessment of direct loss[S].
[25] 李杰. 公路系统地震灾害损失评估方法研究[D].中国地震局工程力学研究所,2012.
LI Jie.study on the seismic damage loss assessment of highway system[D].Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,2012.
[26] JTG/T 3821-2018, 公路工程估算指标[S].
JTG/T 3821-2018,Highway engineering estimation index[S].

PDF(1618 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/