Normal contact stiffness measurement methods based on ultrasonic and image

PDF(1850 KB)

Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 64-69.

ZHAN Jin, LI Meng, LIU Heng, JING Minqing, LIU Yi, YAN Wei

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The contact interface normal stiffnesses are generally measured with the ultrasonic and image methods in engineering application, but the effects of different detection methods on the results are not studied deeply. Here, test platforms were designed and built to measure contact interface normal stiffnesses with ultrasonic and image simultaneously. The experimental results showed that the stiffness measured results with the image method are lower than those with the ultrasonic method, the former is more close to the finite element simulation results. Furthermore, the effects of the two detection methods on the results were analyzed. The study results provided a reference for selecting an appropriate detection method in engineering application.

Key words

contact interface / normal contact stiffness / measurement / image method / ultrasound

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHAN Jin, LI Meng, LIU Heng, JING Minqing, LIU Yi, YAN Wei. Normal contact stiffness measurement methods based on ultrasonic and image[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(1): 64-69

References

[1] de Crevoisier J, Swiergiel N, Champaney L, Hild F (2012) Identification of in situ frictional properties of bolted assemblies with digital image correlation. Exp Mech 52(6): 561–572.
[2] Kartal ME, Mulvihill DM, Nowell D, Hills DA (2011) Determination of the frictional properties of titanium and nickel alloys using the digital image correlation method. Exp Mech 51 (3):359–371.
[3] Kartal ME, Mulvihill DM, Nowell D, Hills DA (2011) Measurements of pressure and area dependent tangential contact stiffness between rough surfaces using digital image correlation. Tribol Int 44(10):1188–1198.
[4] Dwyer-Joyce RS, Drinkwater BW, Quinn AM (2001) The use of ultrasound in the investigation of rough surface interfaces. J Tribol 123(1):8–16.
[5] Baltazar A, Rokhlin SI, Pecorari C (2002) On the relationship between ultrasonic and micromechanical properties of contacting rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solid 50(7): 1397–1416.
[6] Kim J-Y, Baltazar A, Rokhlin SI (2004) Ultrasonic assessment of rough surface contact between solids from elastoplastic loadingunloading hysteresis cycle. J Mech Phys Solid 52(8):1911–1934.
[7] Kendall K, Tabor D (1971) An ultrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces. Proc Roy Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 323(1554):321–340.
[8] Tattersall HG (1973) The ultrasonic pulse-echo technique as applied to adhesion testing. J Appl Phys D Appl Phys 6(7):819–832.
[9] Tong W, Tao H, Jiang X, Zhang N, Marya MP, Hector LG Jr, Gayden XQ (2005) Deformation and fracture of minature tensile bars with resistance-spot-weld microstructures. Metall Mater Trans A 36(10):2651–2669
[10] Savic V, Hector L (2007) “Tensile deformation and fracture of press hardened boron steel using digital image correlation,” SAE Technical Paper, No. 2007-01-0790
[11] Zavattieri PD, Savic V, Hector LG Jr, Fekete JR, Tong W, Xuan Y (2009) Spatio-temporal characteristics of the Portevin-Le Châtelier effect in austenitic steel with twinning induced plasticity. Int J Plast 25(12):2298–2330
[12] Abu-Farha F, Hector LG Jr, Khraisheh M (2009) Cruciform shaped specimens for elevated temperature biaxial testing of lightweight materials. JOM 61(8):48–56
[13] Savic V, Hector LG Jr, Fekete JR (2010) Digital image correlation study of plastic deformation and fracture in fully martensitic steels. Exp Mech 50(1):99–110
[14] 冯若.超声手册[M].南京：南京大学出版社，1999.
FENG Ruo. Ultrasonic Manual[M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1999.
[15] BAIK, J.-M., THOMPSON, R.B. Ultrasonic scattering from imperfect interfaces: a quasi-static model[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 1984,Volume 4, Issue 3-4 , pp 177-196 .
[16] 刘恒，刘意，王为民.接触界面法向刚度等效的新方法[J].机械工程学报，2011.47(17):37-43.
LIU Heng, LIU Yi, WANG Weimin. New Equivalent Method for Normal Stiffness of Contact Interface[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011.47(17):37-43.
[17] 刘意，刘恒，易均.计及塑性接触层的法向接触刚度等效方法[J]. 振动与冲击，2013,32(7)：43-47.
LIU Heng, LIU Yi, YI Jun. Equivalent method for normal contact stiffness considering plastic contact layer[J]. Journal of Vibrating and Shock, 2013,32(7)：43-47.
[18] Brown, L.G., “A survey of image registration techniques,” ACM Computer Surveys, 1992, 24(4), pp. 325-376.
[19] Bing, P., Huimin, X., Boqin, X. and Fulong, D., Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, 17, pp. 1615-1621.
[20] 魏阳杰，吴成东，董再励．基于亚像素图像块匹配方法的压电陶瓷驱动特性测量[J]．机械工程学报，2010，46(17)：151-158.
WEI Yangjie, WU Chengdong, DONG Zaili. Sub-pixel Image Block Matching Based Measurement on Driving Characteristic of a Piezoelectric Actuator[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010，46(17)：151-158.
[21] Jin-Yeon Kim, Arturo Baltazar., Hysteretic linear and nonlinear acoustic responses from pressed interfaces[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43 (2006) 6436-6452
[22] Meng Li, Heng Liu,.Ultrasonic measurement of cylindrical roller bearing lubrication using high pulse repletion rates[J]. Journal of Tribology, Oct 2015,Vol.137.
[23] M. K. Wan Ibrahim, D. Gasni, R. S. Dwyer-Joyce. Profiling a Ball Bearing Oil Film with Ultrasonic Reflection[J]: Tribology Transactions,55:409-421, 2012