Effects of hanging wall/footwall fault parameters on seismic responses of RC frame structures (I: non-isolated structures)

WANG Dayang, ZHANG Yongshan, TANG Chengzhi, HAN Qihao

Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5) : 13-19.

PDF(1025 KB)
PDF(1025 KB)
Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5) : 13-19.

Effects of hanging wall/footwall fault parameters on seismic responses of RC frame structures (I: non-isolated structures)

  • WANG Dayang, ZHANG Yongshan, TANG Chengzhi, HAN Qihao
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Dynamic models for RC frame structures with 4-floor, 8-floor, 12-floor and 16-floor covering common period ranges were established and verified to systematically investigate effects of hanging wall/footwall fault parameters on dynamic responses of RC frame structures. Three NGA ground motion attenuation relation models including ASK, CB and CY models were adopted to fit hanging wall/footwall earthquake records for purposes of comparison and optimization. The optimal fitting model was determined through comparison between fitted results and real 622 hanging wall/footwall ground motion records. Finally, 160 hanging wall/footwall earthquake samples with different fault parameters were fitted based on the optimal NGA model. The relations between hanging wall/footwall ground motion PGA and parameters, such as, earthquake magnitude, soil body shear wave velocity, fault dip angle and upper bound embedded depth were investigated. The effects of hanging wall/footwall fault parameters on dynamic responses of four RC frame structures were studied. The results showed that ASK model can simulate hanging wall/footwall earthquakes well and its simulated results agree best with real earthquake records; PGAs of hanging wall/footwall earthquakes increase with decrease in site distance and increase in earthquake magnitude; fault dip angle has a larger influence on PGAs within hanging wall site distance of 20 km; soil body shear wave velocity and upper bound embedded depth have little effects on PGAs; dynamic responses of four RC frame structures increase with decrease in site distance and soil body shear wave velocity, they increase with increase in earthquake magnitude and structure height; fault dip angle and upper bound embedded depth have almost no effect on structural dynamic responses under a certain footwall site distance; hanging wall earthquakes have a larger effect on dynamic responses of lower RC frame structures, while footwall earthquakes have a bigger effect on dynamic responses of higher ones.

Key words

 hanging wall/footwall earthquake / fault parameters / fitting / RC frame structure / dynamic response

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Dayang, ZHANG Yongshan, TANG Chengzhi, HAN Qihao. Effects of hanging wall/footwall fault parameters on seismic responses of RC frame structures (I: non-isolated structures)[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(5): 13-19

References

[1] 谢礼立. 汶川地震的教训[J]. 南京工业大学学报, 2010, 31(1): 1-8.
XIE Lili. Lessons learnt from Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology, 2010, 31(1): 1-8.
[2] 杨树新, 姚瑞, 崔效锋, 陈群策, 黄禄渊. 中国大陆与各活动地块、南北地震带实测应力特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 55(12): 4207-4217.
Yang Shuxin, Yao Rui, Cui Xiaofeng, Chen Qunce, Huang Luyuan. Analysis of the characteristics of measured stress in Chinese mainland and its active blocks and north-south seismic belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(12): 4207-4217.
[3]. GB 50011-2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
GB 50011-2010 Code for seismic design of building[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
[4] 李爽, 谢礼立, 赫敏. 上盘效应对工程结构位移反应影响分析[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报, 2006(6): 823-827.
LI Shuang, XIE Lili, HAO Min. A study on the displacement response of structures due to hanging wall effects [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 2006, (6): 823-827.
[5] 杨迪雄, 王汉兵, 李刚. 近断层地震动对短肢剪力墙高层结构地震反应的影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动. 2008, 28(6):106-115.
YANG Dixiong, WANG Hanbing, LI Gang. Influence of near-fault ground motions on seismic response of high rise structure with short limb walls[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(6): 106-115.
[6] Abrahamson N A, Somerville P G. Effects of the Hanging Wall and Footwall on Ground Motions Recorded during the Northridge Earthquake[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, (1B):S93-S99.
[7] Shunan Lu. Effects of hanging wall and footwall on demand of structural input energy during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 12 (1): 1-12.
[8] Abrahamson N, Silva W, Kamai R. Update of the ASK Ground-Motion Prediction equations based on the NGA-west2 data set[R]. California: Pacific Engineering Research Center Report, 2013.
[9] Campbell K W. NGA-West2 Campbell-Bozorgnia Ground Motion Model for the Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped Elastic Pseudo-Acceleration Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s[R]. California: Pacific Engineering Research Center Report, 2013.
[10] Chiou B, Youngs R. Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra[R]. California: Pacific Engineering Research Center Report, 2013.
PDF(1025 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/