It is confirmed that the solitary wave method can be used to measure Young’s modulus of homogeneous and inhomogeneous materials, and the performance of solitary wave sensors to collect signals directly affects the accuracy of measurement results.Here, two types of solitary wave sensors based on different principles were introduced, and they were cylindrical sensors made of piezoelectric (PZT) materials and magnetostrictive sensors based on Villari and Faraday effect.Two types of sensors were used, respectively to measure concrete samples with the water-to-cement ratio of 0.42, 0.45 and 0.50.The average value of 100 measurements was compared with the standard reference one to compare the measurement accuracy of two types sensors.Standard deviations of two types sensors’ measured values were analyzed, respectively to compare the repeatability of two types sensors.The test results showed that for the measured values of concrete samples with 3 water-to-cement ratios relative to the standard reference value, deviation rates with cylindrical pressure sensors are 6.48%, 5.04% and 1.85%, respectively, while those with magnetostrictive sensors are 0.78%, 3.08% and 4.94%, respectively; so error rates of both two types sensors are less than 10%, both of them can be used in the actual measurement; the accuracy of the latter is slightly higher than that of the former, and the standard deviation of the latter is lower than that of the former, so the latter has higher repeatability.
Key words
solitary wave /
sensor /
measurement accuracy /
repeatability /
Young’s modulus
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] NESTERENKO V F. Dynamics of Heterogeneous Materials [J]. High-Pressure Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 2001.
[2] DARAIO C, NESTERENKO V F, HERBOLD E B, et al. Tunability of solitary wave properties in one-dimensional strongly nonlinear phononic crystals [J]. Physical Review E, 2006, 73(2): 026610.
[3] YANG J, SILVESTRO C, KHATRI D, et al. Interaction of highly nonlinear solitary waves with linear elastic media [J]. Physical Review E, 2011, 83(4):046606.
[4] PORTER M A, DARAIO C, HERBOLD E B, et al. Highly nonlinear solitary waves in periodic dimer granular chains [J]. Physical Review E. 2008, 77(1): 015601.
[5] NI X L, RIZZO P, YANG J, et al. Monitoring the hydration of cement using highly nonlinear solitary waves [J]. NDT & E International, 2012, 52:76-85.
[6] LI F, ZHAO L X, TIAN Z H, et al. Visualization of solitary waves via laser Doppler vibrometry for heavy impurity identification in a granular chain [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2013, 22(3): 035016.
[7] LI K Y, RIZZO P, BAGHERI A. A parametric study on the optimization of a metamaterial-based energy harvester [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2015, 24(11): 115019.
[8] 邓雯,杨建华,张扬. 基于孤立波的杨氏模量无损检测换能器研究[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2017, 38(11): 2762-2768.
DENG W, YANG J H, ZHANG Y. HNSWs based transducers in measuring Young’s Modulus nondestructively [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2017, 38(11): 2762-2768.
[9] 孟爱华,杨剑锋,蒋孙权,刘帆,刘成龙.柱棒式超磁致伸缩能量收集器的设计与实验[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(12):175-180.
MENG A H, YANG J F, JIANG S Q, et al. Design and experiments of a column giant magnetostrictive energy harvester [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017,36(12):175-180.
[10] 刘祥建,陈仁文.压电振动能量收集装置研究现状及发展趋势[J].振动与冲击,2012,31(16):169-176.
LIU X J, CHEN X W. Current situation and developing trend of piezoelectric vibration energy harvester [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012,31(16):169-176.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1292 KB)
