Wind-resistance performance and aerodynamic optimization of split 3-box section main girder bridges

YANG Fengfan, ZHENG Shixiong, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Xiaotian, HE Ruizhou

Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19) : 137-144.

PDF(2750 KB)
PDF(2750 KB)
Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19) : 137-144.

Wind-resistance performance and aerodynamic optimization of split 3-box section main girder bridges

  • YANG Fengfan, ZHENG Shixiong, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Xiaotian, HE Ruizhou
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Here, to study wind-resistance performance of a split 3-box section main girder bridge and propose effective aerodynamic optimization measures, based on a long-span cable-stayed suspension bridge with split 3-box section main girder for the road-rail dual purpose, wind tunnel tests for segment models were conducted under different wind attack angles, different turbulence flow fields and five different aerodynamic measures. The results showed that box separation can greatly increase the flutter critical wind speed of main girder section, but this situation can complicate the flow field among 3 boxes to cause vortex-induced vibration (VIV); under conditions of the original section in completed bridge state with attack angles of 0° and ±3°, torsional VIV appears with the maximum torsional amplitude of 1.238°; in general, the flutter critical wind speed is higher than 97.3 m/s; the effects of three measures of bridge deck flow restrictor, different maintenance track positions and beam bottom flow deflector are not ideal for torsional VIV suppression; the longitudinal grid with uniform distribution at gap of boxes can effectively suppress torsional VIV, the smaller the air permeability, the more obvious the optimization effect; the grid with air permeability less than 23% can cause decrease in the flutter critical wind speed; the combination measure of grid with 10% air permeability and lower central stabilizer plate can completely suppress torsional VIV and ensure bridge flutter performance; based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the flow field structure and aerodynamic force variation law around the original section and main girder with optimized conditions are obtained; the main cause of main girder’s VIV is the formation of large-scale vortices at gaps among boxes and above downstream highway box; after optimization, large-scale vortices are scattered at gaps among boxes, and root mean squares of lift force and torque time histories are obviously reduced to effectively improve VIV performance of main girder; at the same time, both slopes of lift force and torque coefficient curves under the optimized conditions are positive within the attack angle range of -5°—5°, so main girder has necessary conditions for aerodynamic stability.

Key words

split 3-box section main beam / wind-resistance performance / wind tunnel tests / torsional vortex-induced vibration (VIV) / aerodynamic optimization / computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

Cite this article

Download Citations
YANG Fengfan, ZHENG Shixiong, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Xiaotian, HE Ruizhou. Wind-resistance performance and aerodynamic optimization of split 3-box section main girder bridges[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(19): 137-144

References

[1]YANG Y X, GE Y J. Vortex-induced vibration and aerodynamic countermeasures
for long-span cable-supported bridges with twin box girder [J]. IABSE
Congress Report, 2012, 18(20):771-778.
[2]FALBE-HANSEN K, HAUGE L, KITE S. Stonecutters Bridge-detailed
design [J]. IABSE Symposium Report, 2004, 88(6):19-24.
[3]王骑,林道锦,廖海黎,等.分体式钢箱梁涡激振动特性及制振措施风洞试验研
究[J].公路,2013(7):294-299.
WANG Qi, LIN Daojin, LIAO Haili, et al. Wind tunnel test research on
vortex induced vibration characteristics and vibration control measures of
split steel box girder [J]. Highway, 2013(7):294-299.
[4]BRANCALEONI F, DIANA G. The aerodynamic design of the Messina
Straits Bridge [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 1993, 48(2/3):395-409.
[5]SATO H, KUSUHARA S, OGI K I, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of
super long-span bridges with slotted box girder [J]. Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88(2):297-306.
[6]YANG Y X, ZHANG L, DING Q S, et al. Flutter performance and
improvement for a suspension bridge with central-slotted box girder during
erection[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,
2018, 179: 118-124.
[7]HIRANO S, ITO S, SATO H, et al. Aerodynamic stability of long-span
suspension bridge with slotted girder [J]. IABSE Symposium Report, 2001,
84(8):9-16.
[8]艾国柱,夏华晞. 悬索桥的加劲桁架:明石海峡大桥加劲桁架和加劲箱梁的比
选[J].国外桥梁,2000(4):15-20.
AI Guozhu, XIA Huaxi. Stiffening truss of suspension bridge:comparison of
stiffening truss and stiffening box girder of Akashi Kaikyo Bridge [J].
Foreign Bridges, 2000(4): 15-20.
[9]LAROSE G L, LARSEN S V, LARSEN A, et al. Sectional model
experiments at high reynolds number for the deck of a 1 018 m span
cable-stayed bridge [C]∥11th International Conference on Wind
Engineering. Lubbock: ICWE, 2003.
[10]DE MIRANDA S, PATRUNO L, RICCI M, et al. Numerical study of a
twin box bridge deck with increasing gap ratio by using RANS and LES
approaches [J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99:546-558.
[11]HU C X, ZHAO L, GE Y J. Mechanism of suppression of vortex-
induced vibrations of a streamlined closed-box girder using additional
small-scale components [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 2019, 189: 314-331.
[12]LARSEN A, WALL A. Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex
shedding response[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial
Aerodynamics,2012,104/105/106:159-165.
[13]杨詠昕,周锐,葛耀君.大跨度分体箱梁桥梁涡振性能及其控制[J].土木工
程学报,2014,47(12):107-114.
YANG Yongxin, ZHOU Rui, GE Yaojun. Vortex-induced vibration and its
control for long-span bridges with twin-box girder [J]. China Civil
Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(12): 107-114.
[14]李永乐,安伟胜,李翠娟,等. 基于CFD的分离式三箱主梁气动优化研究[J]
.土木工程学报,2013,46(1):61-68.
LI Yongle, AN Weisheng, LI Cuijuan, et al. Aerodynamic optimization of
three-box-girder deck by CFD method [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,
2013, 46(1): 61-68.
[15]夏锦林, 曹丰产, 葛耀君. 双开槽箱梁断面悬索桥的抗风性能及气动措施
研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017,36(10):69-75.
XIA Jinlin, CAO Fengchan, GE Yaojun. Wind resistance performance of a
double-slotting suspension bridge and its aerodynamic control measures [J
]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017,36(10):69-75.
[16]孟晓亮. 检修车轨道位置对半封闭分离双箱桥梁断面涡振性能的影响[C]
∥第十四届全国结构风工程学术会.北京:中国土木工程学会,2009.
[17]刘君,廖海黎,万嘉伟,等.检修车轨道导流板对流线型箱梁涡振的影响[J]
.西南交通大学学报,2015,50(5):789-795.
LIU Jun, LIAO Haili, WAN Jiawei, et al. Effect of guide vane beside
maintenance rail on vortex-induced vibration of streamlined box girder [J
]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(5): 789-795.
[18]马存明,王俊鑫,罗楠,等.宽幅分体箱梁涡振性能及其抑振措施[J].西南
交通大学学报,2019,54(4):724-730.
MA Cunming, WANG Junxin, LUO Nan, et al. Vortex-induced vibration
performance and control measures of wide twin-box girder [J]. Journal of
Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 724-730.
[19]李志国,周强,马存明,等.中央格栅抑制分离式双箱梁涡振的机理研究[J]
.桥梁建设,2018,48(1):19-24.
LI Zhiguo, ZHOU Qiang, MA Cunming, et al. Mechanism of suppressing
vortex-induced vibration of twin-box girder using central grids [J].
Bridge Construction, 2018, 48(1): 19-24.
[20]欧阳克俭,陈政清.中央稳定板提高颤振稳定性能的细观作用机理[J].振
动与冲击,2016,35(1):11-16.
OUYANG Kejian, CHEN Zhengqing. Micro-mechanism of a central stabilizer
for improving a bridge’s flutter stability [J]. Journal of Vibration and
Shock, 2016, 35(1): 11-16.

 

PDF(2750 KB)

462

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/