In order to solve the problem that the contradiction between pier bottom internal force and girder displacement in the seismic isolation design of continuous bridges with high pier and long span, a seismic isolation system by combining friction pendulum system and brace is proposed based on the structural characteristics of braced-continuous bridge and the idea of energy dissipation, which can realize the double control of pier bottom internal forces and girder displacement. The equivalent damping ratio calculation formula of the brace is derived and the superiority of the combined use of friction pendulum system and brace is verified by contrastively investigating the seismic response of four isolation case. Finally, parameter analysis is carried out for brace, and the advantages in statics of the additional brace are also analyzed. The study results show that the equivalent damping ratio of the brace is 9%, the hogging moment of the fulcrum of the continuous bridge in the static aspect is reduced by 27%, the maximum reduction rate of the pier bottom moment is 79%, the maximum reduction rate of the pier bottom shear force is 83%, and the maximum reduction rate of the girder displacement is 50%. The combined use of friction pendulum system and brace can restrict pier bottom bending moment and girder displacement, and reduce the static and dynamic response of large span continuous bridges effectively.
Key words
continuous bridges /
high pier and long span /
double control of force and displacement /
seismic isolation
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 石 岩,王东升,韩建平,等. 桥梁减隔震技术的应用现状与发展趋势[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(5):118-128.
SHI Yan, WANG Dongsheng, HAN Jianping,et al. Application status of seismic isolation for bridges and its development tendecy[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(5): 118-128.
[2] 方 蓉,康路明,张文学,等. 自复位摩擦耗能支座减隔震机理及试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(23):83-90.
FANG Rong, KANG Luming, ZHANG Wenxue,et al. Seismic reduction and isolation mechanism and tests for self-reset and friction energy-dissipating pedestal[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2021, 40(23): 83-90.
[3] BILLAH A H M M, Todorov B. Effects of subfreezing temperature on the seismic response of lead rubber bearing isolated bridge[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 126: 105814.
[4] CHEN X, LI C X. Seismic performance of tall pier bridges retrofitted with lead rubber bearings and rocking foundation[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 212: 110529.
[5] CHEN X, WU P S, LI C X. Seismic performance assessment of base-isolated tall pier bridges using friction pendulum bearings achieving resilient design[J]. Structures, 2022, 38: 618-629.
[6] MORONI M O, BOROSCHEK R, SARRAZIN M. Dynamic characteristics of Chilean bridges with seismic protection[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005, 10(2): 124-132.
[7] ROBERTS J E. Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(4-5): 449–470.
[8] LI Z, LI D J, PENG L H, et al. Study on the damping efficiency of continuous beam bridge with constant cross-section applied by lead rubber bearings and fluid viscous dampers[J]. Noise & Vibration Worldwide, 2020, 51(4-5): 85–92.
[9] 鲁传安,胡世德,叶爱君. 强震区大跨高墩连续梁桥抗震性能研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2007, 23(6): 56-61.
LU Chuanan, HU Shide, YE Aijun. Study on seismic performance for long span and high pier continuing girder bridges in severe earthquake region[J]. Structual Engineers, 2007, 23(6): 56-61.
[10] QU Z, ZHU B J, CAO Y T, et al. Rapid report of seismic damage to buildings in the 2022 M6.8 Luding earthquake, China[J]. Earthquake Research Advances, 2022, 100180.
[11] ZHANG J P, LIU A R, WU G, et al. Study on operating vehicle load limit of sub-health bridge[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 163: 3369-3375.
[12] GB 50011-2001 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
GB 50011-2001 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2001.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}