Seismic performance of a precast pier with novel socket connection under the compound effect of compression-flexure-torsion

PDF(5094 KB)

Journal of Vibration and Shock ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 118-130.

XIA Zhanghua1，XIE Jun1，FAN Qian1，CHEN Jinsheng2，LIN Yuanzheng3

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In order to clarify and improve the ability of fabricated piers with Socket Connection to resist composite loads such as compression, bending and torsion, a novel socket connection method for prefabricated piers combining grouting sleeves and sockets was proposed for application in ordinary cap. The damage characteristics and hysteresis energy dissipation performance of cast-in-place piers, fabricated piers with grouting sleeves, fabricated piers with sockets and fabricated piers with novel socket connection through quasi-static tests under compound loads, and the effect of socket height on hysteresis performance was analyzed with numerical simulation, and discussed its application feasibility in shallow socket connection. The results show that the failure modes of the four specimens are the bending-torsional failures dominated by bending failure, among which the SU specimen has a slight phenomenon of pulling up, while the corresponding GSU specimen does not have this phenomenon, which is close to the RC specimen. The development trend of the shear force-pier top displacement skeleton curves of each specimen is relatively consistent. Due to the longitudinal steel bar of the GSU specimen is continuous, it has better overall performance, and its flexural load capacity is close to that of RC specimen, and is significantly larger than that of SU and GS specimens. The bending hysteresis energy consumption of the four specimens is relatively close. The torsional bearing capacity of the GSU specimen with the depth of the socket is 1D is slightly higher than that of the RC specimen, and is significantly greater than that of other fabricated pier specimens. The torsional stiffness, ductility coefficient and energy dissipation capacity of the GSU specimen are greater than that of the other three piers. When the depth of the socket is 0.5 times the cross-section width of the specimen, the flexural bearing capacity and torsional bearing capacity of the specimen with novel socket connection are higher than that of the cast-in-place RC specimen, which has a good ability to resist compression, bending and torsional loads, and can realize shallow socket connections. The research results can provide an experimental basis for the application of fabricated piers under the combined action of compression, bending and torsion.

Key words

Bridge engineering / Novel socket connection / Quasi-static test / Segmental bridge piers / Bending and torsional action / Shallow socket / Seismic performance

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

XIA Zhanghua1，XIE Jun1，FAN Qian1，CHEN Jinsheng2，LIN Yuanzheng3. Seismic performance of a precast pier with novel socket connection under the compound effect of compression-flexure-torsion[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2024, 43(12): 118-130

References

[1] 项贻强,竺盛,赵阳.快速施工桥梁的研究进展[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(12):1-27. XIANG Yi-qiang, ZHU Sheng, ZHAO Yang. Research and Development on Accelerated Bridge Construction Technology[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31 (12):1-27. [2] 周良,闫兴非,张凯龙,等.工业化全预制桥梁设计施工关键技术研究及应用[J].建设科技,2018(16):53-55. ZHOU Liang, YAN Xing-fei, ZHANG Kai-long, et al. Research and Application of Key Technologies in the Design and Construction of the Industrialized Prefabricated Bridge[J]. Construction Science and Technology,2018(16):53-55. [3] Osanai Y, Watanabe F, Okamoto S. Stress Transfer Mechanism of Socket Base Connections with Precast Concrete Columns[J].Aci structural journal, 1996, 93(3):266-276. [4] Mashal M, Palermo A. Quasi-Static Cyclic Testing of Half-Scale Fully Precast Bridge Substructure System in High Seismicity[C]. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. Auckland: NZSEE Conference,2014:1-9. [5] Khaleghi B, Schultz E, Seguirant S, et al. Accelerated Bridge Construction in Washington State: from Research to Practice[J]. PCI Journal,2021,57(4):34. [6] Motaref S. Seismic Response of Precast Bridge Columns with Energy Dissipating Joints[D].Reno: University of Nevada. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research,2011. [7] Kavianipour F. Experimental and Analytical Seismic Studies of a Four-Span Bridge System with Composite Piers[D]. Reno: University of Nevada. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research,2013. [8] Haraldsson O S, Janes T M, Eberhard M O, et al. Seismic Resistance of Socket Connection Between Footing and Precast Column[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(9): 910-919. [9] Mohebbi A, Saiidi M S, Itani A M. Shake Table Studies and Analysis of A PT-UHPC Bridge Column with Pocket Connection[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 144(4): 04018021. [10] Mohebbi A, Saiidi M S, Itani A M. Shake Table Studies and Analysis of a Precast Two-Column Bent with Advanced Materials and Pocket Connections[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(7):04018046. [11] 李永波.承插式和插槽式连接预制拼装桥墩抗震性能研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2015. LI Yong-bo. Study on Seismic Performance of Socket and Slot Link Precast Assembled Piers[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University,2015. [12] 韩艳,王龙龙,刘志浩.承插式预制桥墩在车辆碰撞下的动力响应模型试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2021,40(22):267-274+288. HAN Yan, WANG Long-long, LIU Zhi-hao. Model Experimental Analysis on the Dynamic Response of a Socket Prefabricated Pier Under Vehicle Collision[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2021,40(22):267-274+288. [13] 徐艳,曾增,葛继平,等.承插式预制拼装桥墩的最小合理承插深度[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(12):1706-1711. XU Yan, ZENG Zeng, GE Ji-ping, et al. Minimum Reasonable Socket Depth of Precast Pier-footing with Socket Connection[J]. Journal of Tongji university (natural science),2019,47(12):1706-1711. [14] Xu Yan, Zeng Zeng, Wang Zhi-qiang, et al. Experimental Studies of Embedment Length of Precast Bridge Pier with Socket Connection to Pile Cap[J]. Engineering Structures,2021,233(2):111906. [15] Suriya Prakash. Seismic Performance of Circular RC Columns Subjected to Axial Force, Bending, and Torsion with Low and Moderate Shear[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(1): 46-59. [16] Wang P, Han Q, Du X. Seismic performance of circular RC bridge columns with flexure–torsion interaction[J]. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 66:13-30. [17] 邓江东, 刘爱荣, 孙卓,等.弯扭耦合效应下混凝土桥墩的抗震性能[J].中国公路学报, 2017, 30(6): 249-259. DENG Jiang-dong, LIU Ai-rong, SUN Zhuo, et al. Seismic Performance of Concrete Bridge Columns Under Bending-torsion Coupling Effect[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(6): 249-259. [18] 陈宗平,刘祥,陈建佳.型钢混凝土十字形柱复合受扭滞回性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2020，41 (06):108-118. CHEN Zong-ping, LIU Xiang, CHEN Jian-jia. Experimental Study on Hysteretic Behavior of Steel Reinforced Concrete Cross-Shaped Column Under Combined Action of Compression-Flexure-Shear and Torsion[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2020, 41(6):108-118. [19] 杨阳.压弯剪扭复合作用钢筋混凝土T形柱抗震性能研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2017. YANG Yang. Study on Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete T-Shaped Column Under Compression-Flexure- Shear and Torsion Combined Action[D]. Nan Ning: Guangxi University,2017. [20] 葛继平,闫兴非,王志强.灌浆套筒和预应力筋连接的预制拼装桥墩的抗震性能[J].交通运输工程学报,2018,18(2):42-52. GE Ji-ping, YAN Xing-fei, WANG Zhi-qiang. Seismic Performance of Prefabricated Assembled Pier with Grouted Sleeve and Prestressed Reinforcements[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2018,18(02):42-52. [21] 林上顺,黄卿维,陈宝春,等.跨海大桥U-RC组合桥墩设计[J].交通运输工程学报,2017,17(04): 55-65. LIN Shang-shun, HUANG Qing-wei, CHEN Bao-chun, et al. Design of U-RC Composite Pier of Sea-Crossing Bridge[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2017,17(04):55-65. [22] 陈宇良,李浩,陈宗平.复合受扭实腹式型钢混凝土柱恢复力模型研究[J].振动与冲击,2023,42(08):69-78. CHEN Yu-liang, LI Hao, CHEN Zong-ping. A Study on the Restoring Force Model of Composite Torsional Solid Web Steel Reinforced Concrete Columns[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2023,42(08):69-78. [23] Tirasit P, Kawashima K. Seismic Performance of Square Reinforced Concrete Columns under Combined Cyclic Flexural and Torsional Loadings[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 11(3):425-452. [24] 黄福云,陈伟,徐普,薛俊青,等.整体式桥台-H形钢桩-土体系抗震性能试验[J].中国公路学报,2020,33(09):180-192. HUANG Fu-yun, CHEN Wei, Xu Pu, et al. Experimental on Seismic Performance of Integral Abutment-Steel H-Pile-Soil System[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020,33(09):180-192. [25] 葛继平,夏樟华,江恒.灌浆波纹管装配式桥墩双向拟静力试验[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(12):221-230+266. GE Ji-ping, XIA Zhang-hua, JIANG Heng. Biaxial Quasi-static Experiment of Precast Segmental Bridge Piers with Grouting Corrugated Pipe Connection[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018,31(12):221-230+266. [26] 胡聿贤.地震工程学[M].北京:地震出版社,2006. HU Yu-xian. Earthquake Engineering[M]. Beijing: Seismological Publishing House,2006. [27] Park R. Evaluation of Ductility of Structures and Structural Assemblages from Laboratory Testing [J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1989,22(3):155-166 [28] 安明喆, 杨志慧, 余自若, 等.活性粉末混凝土抗拉性能研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2010, 34(1): 54-58. AN Ming-zhe, YANG Zhi-hui, YU Zi-ruo, et al. Experimental Study on the Tensile Performance of Reactive Powder Concrete[J]. Journal of China Railway Society,2010,34(1):54-58. [29] Li Li, Zheng Wen-zhong, Lu Shan-shan. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010,17 (6): 795-800. [30] 方自虎,甄翌,李向鹏.钢筋混凝土结构的钢筋滞回模型[J].武汉大学学报(工学报), 2018,51(7):613- 619. FANG Zi-hu, ZENG Yi, LI Xiang-peng. Steel Hysteretic Model of Reinforced Concrete Structures[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2018,51(7):613- 619.