The permanent magnet type electromagnetic damper has the advantages of contact, no pollution, simple structure and high reliability, and it has a broad development prospect to be applied to the artillery recoil mechanism. However, the intensive impact load generated by the artillery after firing makes the acceleration of the electromagnetic damper up to 1200m/s2. Therefore, the influence of the magnetic braking force under the strong impact load needs to be analyzed urgently. To ensure that the electromagnetic damper can meet the requirements of the artillery recoil mechanism, the recoil equation of motion of the artillery is introduced to obtain the variation law of the magnetic braking force under the intensive impact load, and the analytical model and the finite element model are used to cross-validate the model. The results show that during the recoil process, the edge effect decreases the magnetic field strength in the edge area, which reduces the magnetic braking force; the magnetic saturation increases the area of the eddy current area, which strengthens the eddy current demagnetization effect and causes the magnetic damping force curve to have a "saddle" effect. By analyzing the effect of magnetic braking force, it provides reference for the subsequent design and optimization study of electromagnetic dampers.
Key words
Electromagnetic Damper /
recoil equation of motion /
magnetic braking force /
parasitic effect
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 高树滋, 陈运生, 张月林, 等. 火炮反后坐装置设计 [M]. 北京; 兵器工业出版社. 1995
GAO Shuzi, CHEN Yunsheng, ZHANG Yuelin, et al. Gun recoil mechanism [M]. Beijing： The Publishing House of Ordnance Industry, 1995.
[2] 梁仕民, 杨国来, 李加浩, 等. 永磁式电磁阻尼器磁性能解析计算及阻尼特性分析 [J]. 弹道学报, 2022, 34(03): 91-96.
LIANG Shimin, YANG Guolai, LI Jiahao, et al. Analytical Calculation of Magnetic Performance and Damping Characteristic Analysis of Permanent Magnet Electromagnetic Damper [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2022, 34(03): 91-96.
[3] LI L, YANG G L, WANG L Q. Dynamic mechanical characteristics of NdFeB in electromagnetic brake [J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 19: 111-125.
[4] SANG N, ZHANG C, CHEN J, et al. A Dual-Sided Hybrid Excitation Eddy Current Damper for Vibration Suppression in Low Damping Linear Motor System [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(10): 9897-9907.
[5] CHEN C, XU J, YUAN X, et al. Characteristic Analysis of the Peak Braking Force and the Critical Speed of Eddy Current Braking in a High-Speed Maglev [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(13): 2622.
[6] TARVIRDILU ASL R, YüKSEL H N M, KEYSAN O. Multi-objective design optimization of a permanent magnet axial flux eddy current brake [J]. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 2019: 998-1011.
[7] PETRINI F, GIARALIS A, WANG Z. Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 204: 109904.
[8] SHARIF S, FAIZ J, SHARIF K. Performance analysis of a cylindrical eddy current brake [J]. Iet Electric Power Applications, 2012, 6(9): 661-668.
[9] FRANEK J. Permanent magnet motion in a copper tube [J]. Turkish Journal of Physics, 2018, 42(2): 125-135.
[10] 王楠楠, 刘宁, 沈艳萍, 等. 冲击载荷下圆筒型电涡流阻尼器动力特性研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(11): 65-69.
WANG Nannan, LIU Ning, SHEN Yanping, et al. Dynamic characteristics of cylindrical eddy current damper under impact load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(11): 65-69.
[11] GULBAHCE M O, KOCABAS D A. A comprehensive approach to determining the speed/torque relationships of eddy current brakes [J]. Electrical Engineering, 2018, 100(3): 1579-1587.
[12] CHEN H, YU F, YAN W, et al. Calculation and Analysis of Eddy-Current Loss in Switched Reluctance Motor [J]. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 2021, 31(8): 1-4.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(2072 KB)
